The Politics of “Tomorrow Belongs To Me” from Cabaret

With its book by Joe Masteroff, music by John Kander, and lyrics by Fred Ebb, Cabaret is quite significant in the history of musical theatre. The show sort of defies categorization. Adapted from the Berlin stories of Christopher Isherwood, Cabaret follows American writer Cliff Bradshaw as he travels to Berlin (as the 3rd Reich begins its rise to power) to find inspiration for the novel he’s writing—and boy does he find inspiration. Demanding that the audience “leave [their] troubles outside”, the opening number of the show—“Wilkommen”, arguably one of the greatest opening numbers in all of musical theatre—tells the audience exactly what they’re in for: comedy with plenty of focus on debauchery, facilitated by an emcee who enjoys himself a bit too much. (To see the original cast’s performance at the 1967 Tony Awards, click here: https://youtu.be/A9uE9TmpieI?t=90)

The storytelling of the show is divided rather cleanly into two distinct worlds: the main story goes on in Berlin, and then there are songs that take place in the Kit Kat Club which between scenes comment on the events of the story. As an example of how this commentary works in act 1, let’s take a look at “Perfectly Marvelous” & “Two Ladies”—the former taking place in the real world, and the latter in the Kit Kat Club directly after. Early on in the play, Cliff ends up agreeing to let an English singer from the Kit Kat Club (which is an actual place in the main story, not just the limbo world for the commentary songs) room with him where he is residing in Berlin. When Cliff protests for fear of social ridicule regarding his rooming with a woman to whom he isn’t married, Sally Bowles (the singer) sings the song “Perfectly Marvelous”, in which she tells him what he can say to any skeptics, at the end of which he agrees to let Sally room with him. After this scene, the emcee and two cabaret girls sing “Two Ladies” at the Kit Kat Club, which expresses how risqué Sally & Cliff staying in the same room is by offering a more extreme example: the emcee and the two ladies sleeping together as a trio.

With the comedic tone established throughout the show, the closing scene of act 1 throws quite a curveball at the audience: Nazis. After a pair of older characters decides to get married, they throw a party to celebrate their engagement. At this party, it is revealed that one of the characters whom Cliff (and by extension the audience) has come to respect is a supporter of the Nazi party. As soon as Herr Ernst Ludwig takes off his jacket and reveals his red armband with a swastika on it, the tone of the show can never be the same. Attending the party as an old friend of the bride-to-be (Fraulein Schneider), Herr Ludwig feels compelled to leave after learning that the groom-to-be (Herr Schulz) is Jewish. Trying to keep Herr Ludwig from leaving, another partygoer (Fraulein Kost) begins to sing “Tomorrow Belongs To Me”—written as a pastiche of a Nazi anthem—and this initiates the most powerful moment in the show (with the possible exception of the very end of the finale). As more and more of the guests join in singing the song, the understanding that the Nazi party is gaining support from Germans of all walks of life hangs over the heads of the principal couples (Cliff & Sally and Herr Schulz & Fraulein Schneider, who listen in worried silence) and over the audience, which is filled with people who know what the Nazi party’s rise to power means for the world. The video of the Donmar Warehouse production of Cabaret does an excellent job of giving the viewer a look at each of the four’s distress regarding the situation, and the entire scene is truly well-performed. To watch the entire party scene from that production, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbw8WGupTmE&list=PLrBEhoLJ_TN_rXUUxU_47xp4ErgbD7d1H&index=8

(As a matter of clarity, it should be noted that the emcee—dressed in a trench coat and displaying his bottom with a red swastika tattooed to it at the end of the scene in this production—is not a Nazi sympathizer. As revealed in the extremely sobering end of the show, the emcee is actually Jewish, as he takes off his trench coat to reveal a concentration camp uniform before singing “Auf Wiedersehen” to the audience.)

“Tomorrow Belongs To Me” marks a complete shift in the tone of the rest of the show. Whereas the first act until this point has been comedic and focused on debauchery, the second act becomes focused on how the four leads deal with the changes happening in Berlin. In a stroke of poetic and symbolic genius, the emcee maintains his wild (and, in the Donmar Warehouse production, extremely sexually-charged) and humorous mannerisms throughout the rest of the show, right up until he removes his trench coat at the very end of the finale, as mentioned above. (Alan Cumming’s demeanor change after taking off his coat in the Donmar Warehouse production is a phenomenal moment of acting, as a matter of interest.) By maintaining the comedic style of commentary on the events of the show, the seriousness with which the characters consider what to do about their situation is juxtaposed with the way the rest of the world takes no notice and carries on as before.

Most people in the audience of any production of Cabaret will have nearly the same ideas and reactions to the end of the party scene. It is generally agreed (to my knowledge from my perspective as an American with certain ideals that I have always assumed go along with that) that the actions of the Nazis were terrible and that their supporters are a threat to the world. To those that agree with that view of Nazis, as Kander & Ebb did, “Tomorrow Belongs To Me” is clearly meant to make the audience uneasy. It’s powerful and terrifying to an audience that fears Nazis being in power anywhere again (as American audiences in 1966 would be, given how much fresher WWII was at that time).

There are people, however, for whom the song has a completely different (and backwards) meaning. For some who take the song out of context, “Tomorrow Belongs To Me” is an anthem that can unify people in support of Nazi ideals. In March of 2017, Neo-Nazi Richard Spencer (who, per a quick Google search, prefers other labels than Neo-Nazi) referenced the song in a Twitter response, linking a video of it from the 1972 Cabaret film to make his point. (To view an—informal—article responding to the Twitter thread which includes screenshots of the tweets, click here: http://www.pajiba.com/web_culture/is-tomorrow-belongs-to-me-from-cabaret-a-neonazi-anthem-.php) The tweet got a reply from Jason Kander (nephew of John Kander) that pointed out the irony of the song being used to promote Neo-Nazi views. Given that the song was written by two Jews (Kander & Ebb), there’s no reasonable perspective that can lead to actually believing “Tomorrow Belongs To Me” was intended as a pro-Nazi anthem in 1966. In the documentary series Broadway: The American Musical, Hal Prince comments quite clearly on the relationship between the Civil Rights Movement in the US and Cabaret being about Germany just before the Nazis’ rise to power. He says “I brought in a photograph from Life magazine, a two-page spread of a bunch of Arian Nazi boys snarling at the camera. And of course, it was in our country, and it was them snarling at some poor little black girl.” (Link to the section about Cabaret in the episode here: https://youtu.be/DymYqaBFdcA?list=PLl2LG8zi1XLBdwv_jiMReatyE5Raipdvx&t=883) There was no positive feeling about Nazis at work behind the scenes of the show.

This removal of song from context is something that takes place with all sorts of music. In an article on Musicology Now from September 2019, Ted Gordon discusses how classical music (specifically the music of Haydn) is sometimes used to similarly promote alt-right sentiments. (Link to the article here: http://musicologynow.ams-net.org/2017/09/does-music-trump-politics-dennis-prager.html) With the context of a controversial concert in California, Gordon discusses how Haydn’s music is used by Dennis Prager & Heinrich Schenker as being symbolic of the greatness of western culture & Austro-German culture, respectively. While few people (well, actually there definitely are some) would argue that Haydn’s music isn’t worthy of esteem, its use as a means of promoting nationalistic ideas is quite similar to Spencer’s concept of “Tomorrow Belongs To Me”. Neo-Nazi supporters go so far as to claim that Kander & Ebb’s use of German folk songs as models for the song validates their claims about the song’s intent, ignoring the fact that their decision to write a reasonably similar pastiche of songs that did have that intent was a decision born of the power and validity it would add to the song’s function in the scene and the show as a whole. Using the music of Wagner, who was absolutely anti-Semitic, to draw support for Nazi sentiments is one thing, but to use a song meant to comment negatively on the Nazi rise to power for that end is another matter entirely. The irony of ripping “Tomorrow Belongs To Me” from its context in this way only serves to made evident the ignorance of Neo-Nazi supporters.

Aladdin the Musical at the 2014 Tony Awards

One of the biggest changes to Broadway in the last 25 years was when Disney began to expand its entertainment behemoth onto the live stage. Following the success of its first Broadway production (Beauty and the Beast, opening in 1994) and most famous & successful so far (The Lion King, which has been running for over 20 consecutive years now), Disney has been adapting many of its beloved animated classics for the stage in recent years. One of Disney’s more recent additions to the Broadway scene was Aladdin the Musical. With an accessible story, fantastic music, and breathtaking set & costume design & staging (not to mention help from the original movie’s popularity), Aladdin was a big hit on Broadway, as well as on national tours. It should come as no surprise, then, that the production had a featured performance at the 2014 Tony Awards. (You can view the performance from the telecast of the Tonys here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UL0CDMhjj4)

For the performance at the Tony Awards, the Aladdin company performed “Friend Like Me”, Genie’s show-stopping introductory number. Taking place in the Cave of Wonders, the set certainly delivers on the expectations for what that might entail—with dazzling gold- and jewel-covered pillars and a menacing stone background, it’s a very detailed set that’s even more astounding when seen live. The set prepares the audience excellently for the spectacle about to unfold as Genie begins to sing. Throughout the number, all sorts of factors come together to make the performance stellar. Various jokes in the words, music, and staging—some obvious in the scene and some in reference to outside things, including a nod to the fact that the performance is at the Tonys (“Dance like you’re holding a Tony!”)—keep the audience laughing; some magic tricks and pyrotechnics (although much less than in the context of the full show!) wow the audience; the dance breaks give great, extended opportunities for the orchestra and the chorus (as well as Genie & Aladdin) to shine (literally, to an extent); the lighting cues add to the changes in pace throughout (with the most noticeable moment being when the lights go blue for Genie’s moment to rest from dancing to sing some “classics”—excerpts of songs from other Disney shows); and the music itself is just a blast.

It’s interesting to consider what the thought process was behind this song being selected for the Tony Awards performance. Most people wouldn’t argue with selecting this song to represent the production as a whole, and there are several good reasons for that. In my opinion, the number is representative of what the show appeals to in the audience: there’s an element of awe to it, it’s funny and over-the-top, and Genie steals the show. (Oh, and apparently the actor for Aladdin is good-looking, for what that’s worth from the comments on the video.) Having seen the production when it was on tour in Chicago, the scene in the Cave of Wonders was the one that stuck with me the most, so from that experience I would say it’s a great number to show off the show.

The number is also a great choice for performing at an awards show because it’s a spectacle number and a show-stopper. What makes it even more applicable to this particular awards show is that the actor featured most prominently in the number was nominated to receive an award for that year. Genie’s actor, James Monroe Iglehart, was nominated for (and actually won) the 2014 Tony for Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical for his portrayal of Genie, and this number shows why. Iglehart sings or dances (often both simultaneously) for almost the entire four-and-a-half minutes of the number, and he hardly seems to break a sweat! Commenter Mica Xoxo points this out, stating “How does he move around that much AND sing at the same time and not pass out[?]” Needless to say, Iglehart also sounds and looks great the entire time, adding to the impressiveness of his endurance.

“How does he move around that much AND sing at the same time and not pass out like I woulda been dead not even half way through the song” – Mica Xoxo, commenter

The only dissent to be found anywhere in the comments section regarding the quality of Iglehart’s performance is based solely on the popularity (and impression left on people’s hearts) of Robin Williams’s portrayal of Genie in the original animated movie, which, as commenter Kat Holland expressed, “is a shame…[because] these are two entirely different versions of the same song with different goals and different target audiences.” (Kat Holland’s comment was actually on the video with the Broadway cast album recording of the song, accessible here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HdwdptrmQQ)

“This is such a wonderful rendition of this song and I think it is a shame that people are comparing it to Robin Williams’ version instead of just appreciating the two completely separately.” – Kat Holland, commenter

As great as Williams’s performance is, one can’t deny that Iglehart has a lot more work to do in bringing the role to life than just voice acting. The two mediums require very different things of the actors, and the stage has very different limitations (as well as benefits) from animation’s limitations (and benefits). If this were a live-action movie instead of a live performance, there would be yet more completely different aspects available for comparison, but even as commenters discuss how everything seems to look for the upcoming Aladdin movie (featuring Will Smith as Genie), it’s not completely fair to judge them against each other as “better” or “worse” without addressing the differences in art form. (Anyone wanting to watch the version of the song from the original animated movie can do so here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99Op1TaXmCw)

Often just as noteworthy as what a chosen number to perform at the Tonys does showcase is what the number doesn’t showcase about the production. There are a lot of leading and supporting characters who don’t participate in this number, with Jasmine & Jafar being the main two. In this particular case, there is no reason for me to question the validity of the decision considering everything said above, but it’s still interesting to point out (and perhaps someone else would want to expand on it).

Having seen the touring production on Broadway in Chicago twice during the summer of 2017, I can say with complete sincerity that this scene was even more spectacular live. The Cave of Wonders and the scene taking place inside it took my breath away and stuck with me both times. Commenter Caleb DeLaBruere agrees with me, stating: “I got to see this show live on Broadway, and let me say, the video doesn’t do it justice. It’s even better in person, and I’ve heard of instances when the genie gets a standing ovation at the end of this act.”



“I got to see this show live on Broadway, and let me say, the video doesn’t do it justice.” – Caleb DeLaBruere, commenter

Commenter mermermer123 brought to the attention of those reading the comments that “they made the song shorter for the Tonys!!!”, supporting how Iglehart’s performance is even more impressive in the context of the show by virtue of there being more that he does during the number. The number was indeed reduced to fit the slot for the Tony Awards, as is made evident by the length of the cast recording of the song. The Tony Awards performance is greatly reduced in length from the 7’35” recording, which itself is also cut down (as big numbers frequently are on Broadway cast albums) from the full version performed in the show.

“And just think they made the song shorter for the Tonys!!!” – mermermer123, commenter