This Is America and the Ubiquity of Politics

Politics is a sticky subject, and one that seems to show up in every aspect of our lives in some way or another. Throughout all of American history, minority groups and underprivileged people have been systematically oppressed, and this oppression usually gives birth to many different forms of protests. When most people think of protests, they think of the images of Martin Luther King Jr. making a speech or staging a peaceful march, or of the many protesters holding up signs in a city street. What usually doesn’t come to mind, though, is protest music, and it is protest music that this post will focus on.

Protest music has been created throughout history by many different musicians from many different backgrounds, and it is one of the clearest examples of how politics can make its presence felt in every part of our life. There have been many examples of protest songs in America, from Nina Simone’s “Mississippi Goddam”, to Edwin Starr’s “War”, to Gil Scott-Heron’s “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”, protest music has been a part of American culture for a long time. Recently, with the introduction of social media into our daily lives, political tension is seemingly reaching greater and greater levels as people become more aware of the atrocities committed in America.

With this in mind, let’s take a look at perhaps the most provocative piece of protest music we’ve gotten in a long time: Childish Gambino’s 2018 song, “This Is America”. When Childish Gambino (real name Donald Glover) released this song and its accompanying music video, it went viral, and is currently sitting at 536 million views on Youtube. If you just listen to the song on its own, it doesn’t seem like such an overt piece of protest music, but it’s the music video that makes it so provocative. The video contains countless references – some subtle, some not so subtle – to issues that the black community faces in America.

The video is extremely clever in the way it symbolizes American culture. There are two things to pay attention to: what is happening in the foreground, and what is happening in the background, and how they relate to American society. The foreground happenings are all centered around Gambino. Gambino’s dances throughout the video are taken from many viral dances and videos around the internet. In between the dancing, there are two instances of gun violence shown; the first, where Gambino shoots a man tied to a chair with a bag over his head, and the second where Gambino shoots a singing and dancing chorus. At both of these points, the music switches from a cheery, gospel-like church chorus sound to a heavy, agitated rap verse, before slowly returning to the more cheery sound. In the background, the references are more subtle. People carry the guns off-screen carefully handled and wrapped in cloth while dragging away the dead body in the first instance, or running towards the chorus angrily in the second. A man (who looks to possibly be representing a police officer) forcibly pulls someone out of their car. Another man jumps from a high place in the rafters in what looks like a suicide attempt. Other younger people sit on their phones recording all of these events happening.

Image result for this is america
A still from Childish Gambino’s “This Is America”

What happens in the foreground and background in the video is similar to what happens in the foreground and background of our lives. Gambino’s dancing seems to be a reference to how we as a society get easily distracted from these issues with viral trends, and when the terrible events do happen – the homocides and mass shootings that make national headlines – it doesn’t take long before they fade back into the background.

This video is a perfect example of how protest music can use a medium like music and video as a way to protest. A couple years before this video was released, Colin Kaepernick also used a new medium to protest; the medium of the National Anthem ceremony before football games. It just goes to show how many different ways there are to protest politics, and similarly, it shows how politics can make its presence known in so many different areas of our lives.

A Rare Appearance of Coltrane On Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePScRElDHOY

This video of John Coltrane playing, “On Green Dolphin Street,” is less of a music video and more of a music documentary.  What it lacks in production value is made up for in historical value. There are no expensive props or dazzling visual animations— just four musicians playing a simple 32-bar form, show tune. Because the context of their performance is so spontaneous and evidently casual (because the leader missed the session), each musicians talent is showcased brilliantly and without distraction.

The quartet’s first musical decision is to start the tune off with a rubato piano intro featuring one complete statement of the melody.  Paul Chambers accompanies him with the bow which sets up a nice contrast for the pizzicato petal-point figure he plays when Jimmy Cobb brings the time in.  The staging and camera work reflects the musical decisions made by the quartet perfectly. The video opens with an overhead shot of Wynton Kelly’s hands on the piano.  They pull the camera back to reveal Paul Chambers, then Jimmy Cobb, and finally John Coltrane, but just his silhouette. Once Coltrane brings in the melody, the lighting shifts and the horn player has the spotlight.  

During the saxophone solo, we have some subtle camera movement to add liveliness and motion to the shot.  A wavelike animation also appears right by the bell of Coltrane’s saxophone. The first time I watched this video, I was mystified by the animation that fades in around 2:18 until I read mobuisII’s comment which points out that the animation was generated using an oscilloscope.  The waves are entertaining and they offer some variation to an otherwise static shot, but they don’t do much for me. I find myself not paying too much attention to them while they are visible and I certainly don’t miss the when they fade out.

While the decision to include the oscilloscope animation was questionable on the videographer’s part, all the decisions they made with the lighting were excellent.  Jakob Kurup says in the comment section that the, “musicians almost look divine.” The image of these legendary musicians playing against a solid black background is quite powerful.  The spotlight illuminates each one of them when they take a solo casting dramatic shadows over their concentrated expressions. Sometimes it even appears as though the musicians are glowing when the camera goes slightly in and out of focus temporarily blurring the picture.

The first two cuts in the video happen at the end of the saxophone solo into the piano solo. We see Coltrane’s profile for the entirety of his solo and towards the end a three quarter shot gets overlayed with the profile shot.  The profile shot quickly fades out and the viewer gets to watch Coltrane finish his solo from the three quarter angle. The next transition is a slower one which shows the back of Wynton Kelly sitting at the piano. All of the video editing described previously happens in about 15 seconds and is done very smoothly.  The video is certainly deserving of Chris Lawrence’s praise, “So incredibly polished and professional. Like something out of a movie. Breathtaking stuff.”

The “no-frills” vibe of this video combined with the greatest playing the history of jazz has to offer makes this production something that belongs in an archive.  Watching this video as a musician is a truly educational, and equally inspiring, experience because we get to understand how Coltrane and his contemporaries carried themselves on stage through visual means.  We’re not left guessing how Wynton Kelly’s hands looked on the piano, or how Paul Chambers held his bow all thanks to the skilled recording engineers at work that day.

“when the party’s over”

Emerging alternative-pop artist Billie Eilish has written many songs that describe loss and heartbreak. With over 2.5 billion overall combined streams globally, one of her most popular songs, “when the party’s over” describes the ups and downs of a toxic relationship.

“when the party’s over” was written by Billie’s own brother, Finneas O’Connell, who had claimed he had just “wrote this crazy f*cking song.” The lyrics allude to an unhealthy relationship, as she confronts her partner about their relationship, but it is hard to let go.

“Don’t you know I’m no good for you
I’ve learned to lose you, can’t afford to
Tore my shirt to stop you bleedin’
But nothin’ ever stops you leavin’”

lyrics from http://storyofsong.com/story/when-the-partys-over/

The chorus repeats “And I’ll call you when the party’s over” alluding to the two meeting up after a party because they need each other, even though Billie is trying to move on away from them. This concept is relatable to many people, as unhealthy relationships can tend to spiral out of control.

The meaning of the title can also have another meaning, other than toxic relationships with other people. It can also allude to the anxieties that people encounter when they go to a social event with other people around. Many people can appear to be fine at a big social gathering, but what happens to them after? It may be a huge sigh of relief that it’s over, because it can be overwhelming to some.

One of Billie’s main inspirations is Tyler the Creator. The two seem to have a thing for merging traditional body horror with the psychological torture of social anxiety in their music videos.

“when the party’s over” video was inspired by one of Billie’s own fans, where they drew a picture of her with black eyes and black dripping down her face. She was immediately star-struck by the image, and wanted to recreate it in this video.

Billie Eilish’s “when the party’s over” music video

When the video released, fans went nuts over it and curiosity struck as to how these effects were created. The video shows Billie alone in an empty room, dressed in all white. She forcefully drinks an entire glassful of a pure black liquid. As she is finished, the same black liquid oozes out of both her eyes. This is not the average “girl crying and mascara dripping down her face” kind of vibe, but more of a gruesome yet beautiful image.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BqBZGBlFGVH/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
Billie’s instagram (post now deleted) of how the effects were made in “when the party’s over”

As Billie drinks the liquid, it seems as if she is forcefully finishing all of it. Since so many of her songs are about toxic relationships, the black substance alludes to an unhealthy relationship

YouTuber “Cherry Pie” comments: “My interpretation of the video: Her sitting in an all white room with white clothing means that she is in a place of mind where she pure and happy. Even though many bad things have happened (which is kept in the cup) she is trying to rethink it to make herself a happier person. That’s why if you think about it she looks like she is hesitating to drink the cup of black liquid because she knows it will hurt her, but she can’t help herself so she gives into the pain. She drinks it and then the black tears come out of her eyes to show that she is suffering from not letting go on the darkness in her mind. Before the end, you can see she isn’t moving from her seat, she stays silent and still while this pain goes inside of her, and because she didn’t say anything and no one came to help, the sadness ripped her apart to death. I think this video represents that if there is sadness in your heart and everyday it gets heavier, do not stay silent about it. Heartbreaks and other things in life can be terrible, but do not hold it in, or else it will find it’s way out one way or another. Find someone to talk to your pain about. Don’t stay silent about it “

This comment stood out the most, as it also had 3.6k likes on it. Although most of the time, YouTube comments focus more on the negative aspects of a video, Cherry Pie’s comment is an example that now and then, there are people on the internet trying to spread love and awareness. I would agree/stand by this interpretation, as it describes a lot of pain that Billie is experiencing, and by drinking the entire glass of black liquid, she is giving in to the pain because she can’t help it. In an interview about the music video, Billie even stated that she enjoys pain and being uncomfortable: “Dude, I bring the most miserable things onto myself. I just do, I don’t know why I do it, but I do it. I just love pain. I’ve always loved pain. I love being uncomfortable.”

For the majority of the comments on this video, many focus on the positive and humerous aspects of Billie’s video. Jordan Alana comments a funny, “when you accidentally get liquid eyeliner in your eye 😩😩” while Madison Mitchell uses a popular meme “Me: Billie stop crying ink Billie Eilish: i said i like it like that”

Although not all the comments are as deep and emotional like Cherry Pie’s, there are fewer negative comments than one expects to see on the Internet. Rather than slamming on the artist, many YouTube comments commend her on the powerful message she is sending to her audience.

bury a friend

Billie Eilish is a rising American singer and songwriter. She’s only seventeen and has already accomplished way more than I ever will. I love her. Billie Eilish and her brother, Finneas O’Connell writes, produces and records all their songs. We grew up hearing thousands of different songs everywhere around us, and often underestimate how difficult it is to write a song, whether it be pop, classical or jazz, etc. But even coming up with a decent melody is actually very challenging. I have to compose a song for theory 202 by next week, and so far it literally sounds like garbage lmao

Related image

Billie Eilish’s debut album, When We All Fall Asleep, Where Do We Go?, was released on March 29th, 2019. The album title is a line from her song “bury a friend”, released on January 30th, 2019. The accompanying music video plays a significant role in making ‘bury a friend’ so impactful. Eilish mentioned that she always knows exactly what she wants her music videos to be like, and is very involved with the filming and editing process. So it’s safe to presume that her songs and the music videos are closely related.

The video takes place in a dark, ominous, rundown apartment complex. There are three main settings that are interchanged throughout: a bedroom, empty hallways and a white room that resembles a lab. The music video opens with a man suddenly waking up from his sleep and then lying back down. He then mutters “Billie” and the camera pans down to reveal Eilish, with all-black eyes, lurking under his bed. She stumbles through flickering corridors then is grabbed and manhandled aggressively by gloved hands. When she sings the line “I wanna end me”, these gloved hands inject dozens of syringes filled with black liquid. This sequence of singing under/next to the guy’s bed, stumbling down the hallways, gloved hands pushing and pulling her then injecting needles on her back, repeats over the course of the video. One noticeable difference is that as the video progresses her body and face also progressively contort and transform unnaturally, looking more and more possessed and frightening. Towards the end of the song when she sings the lyrics:

“For the debt I owe, gotta sell my soul
‘Cause I can’t say no, no, I can’t say no
Then my limbs all froze and my eyes won’t close
And I can’t say no, I can’t say no”

The camera zooms into her face, and her eyes are completely black, and her face is completely unnatural and emotionless, making those lyrics more effective. This is just one example of many where the video amplifies its connection with the music.

The music video ends with the camera zooming out on the man’s bed but Eilish no longer present under his bed. The song and the video both ends but the beat keeps on going, and the beat actually transitions straight into the next track in her album – ‘ilomilo’.

The song itself already has a sinister, eerie undertone, with the almost monotone melody, her whispery voice, and the dark lyrics. But the music video really levels-up the horror movie vibe of the song. Once you’ve watched the video it’ll be very hard for you to make your mind not automatically conjure up the video next time you hear the song.

Here are some of people’s reactions to this creepy music video:



When I first heard the song on the radio, I thought the song was about suicide because the line “I wanna end me” is so prominent and repetitive. Then I watched the music video and read the entire lyrics and I guessed that the song and the video is about drug addiction. Billie stated in an interview that she wants the listener to ultimately decide what the meaning behind her songs is, but she did mention in an interview that the song is about sleep paralysis and written from the perspective of the “monster under the bed”. I think it’s interesting how she wants the audience to decide what her songs mean to them, and so chooses not to discuss too much about her interpretation of them. Reading Youtube comments is an easy way to read millions of opinions in a short period of time just by scrolling down. I usually never really read youtube comments because irrational hateful comments that some people leave usually annoy the heck out of me. But I didn’t find any bad comments on this video. In fact, it was really cool how so many people interpreted the song differently:




same

In conclusion, Billie Eilish is awesome and everyone should go listen to her songs if you somehow haven’t already

Bibliography:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bury_a_Friend
https://consequenceofsound.net/2019/02/song-of-the-week-billie-eilish-asks-the-big-questions-on-bury-a-friend/
https://www.songmeaningsandfacts.com/billie-eilishs-bury-a-friend/
http://bcheights.com/2019/02/03/billie-eilish-spooks-in-haunting-bury-a-friend/
https://consequenceofsound.net/2019/02/song-of-the-week-billie-eilish-asks-the-big-questions-on-bury-a-friend/



The Art of Visuals and Videography: How has Youtube Changed the Deliverance of an Epic Disney Medley

There is no doubt that Youtube has changed the game for many aspiring musicians. As an user-friendly, free (for the most part), and incredibly accessible platform, Youtube has become a digital space for creators to showcase their talents to the world. Youtube is definitely a successful outlet, given the amount of superstars that got their starts on it.

I remember when I watched the music videos posted by my favorite youtube artists whenever I could. From Kina Grannis to Kurt Hugo Schneider to Megan Nicole, I must have spent countless hours on Youtube in high school (with VPN – thank you, China for blocking every social platform I used!) watching covers of my favorite pop songs produced by these aspiring musicians. 

One genre that I remember being particularly drawn to was the world of a capella. As a self-proclaimed Disney fanatic, I fangirled over Peter Hollens and Alex G’s Epic Disney Medley as a 16 year-old teenager.

I watched this video at least 20 times, and marveled over how amazing this video was; reading through the comments, a lot of people seem to agree:

Rewatching the video now as a senior in a music conservatory, I have to admit that I am not blown away. In fact, I don’t really understand why I loved it so much five years ago. One thing that I definitely noticed is the amount of attention and detail put into the production of the video. This raises several questions: What role do the visuals play in this video? How does the video complement the medley itself? How does sight affect one’s auditory perceptions on a piece of music?

  1. “Yes, We are Actually Singing (A Capella Style)” 

One common characteristic that I frequently find across a lot of a cappella music videos are deliberate shots of the artist recording the different voice parts against a solid background all playing simultaneously. This music video is no exception.

I believe the intention of such videography is pretty clear: for viewers who are unfamiliar with a capella, these clips provide a visual representation of what a cappella is about. For viewers who are familiar with this style, these clips add another layer of professionalism and awe. Regardless, the music video is a confirmation that yes, Hollens and Alex G actually sang all the voice parts and this song is actually an a cappella piece. 

So Which Movie (And What Characters) Do My Costumes and Locations Remind You Of?”

As the medley unfolds all the different songs it is comprised of, the visuals transition from one set of costumes to another:  from Alex G’s flowing blue maxi skirt in a desert during A Whole New World to Peter’s bright red velvet shirt during Under the Sea (with Peter imitating Sebastian the Crab in a pool underwater), all the pieces of clothing are deliberately chosen to reflect the characters both singers are trying to portray at different points of the song. 

Changing the costumes is an incredibly smart move in terms of audience engagement and outreach. The producers know that not everybody on Youtube is a Disney fanatic: by providing clear visual elements, it allows audiences who aren’t as educated in Disney movies to easily identify which songs come from what movie. For viewers are Disney fanatics, the shots add a pop of excitement and (along with the songs themselves) nostalgia as the video rolls along. 

Concluding Thoughts 

Overall, the visuals themselves play a crucial role in the success of this song. Without the visual elements, I truly believe that the medley would lose the sense of magic and awe that the videography provides. Perhaps this is why so many a cappella videos on Youtube (or any music video, for that matter) take a long time to produce: from planning the video to hiring the best videographers, a lot of though goes behind these videos for maximum audience engagement. 

Want more a capella Disney covers? Check out this Epic Disney Villain Medley!

“Django Jane”

First things first: if you’ve never heard of Janelle Monáe, you need to check out her “Emotion Picture” entitled “Dirty Computer.”

The entire video is around 49 minutes long, and it’s worth every second. The music and lyrics are paired with rich, thought-provoking visuals, including the infamous “pussy pants” from the song “PYNK.”

The music and visuals work together to empower the female body, focusing in particular on the black, queer, female body. The title, “Dirty Computer,” sets up a theme throughout the “Emotion Picture” of a futuristic world where white “cleaners” attempt to “cleanse” Monáe and her friends of their “dirty” memories. I interpreted this as a reflection of white society’s ongoing efforts to suppress blackness; to “whitewash.” As the video progresses, it becomes clear that the “cleaners” are trying to erase Monáe’s individuality and suppress her intersectional identity. Monáe says, “This album is about celebrating other Dirty Computers who have been pushed to the margins of society. This album is about reckoning what it means to have your rights trampled on and to face opposition, perseverance.”

One video from “Dirty Computer” that stood out to me was that which accompanied the song “Django Jane.”

Again, the musical style, lyrics, and visuals work together in this piece to promote Monáe’s intersectional identity. She says Django Jane is, “a response to me feeling the sting of the threats being made to my rights as a woman, as a black woman, as a sexually liberated woman, even just as a daughter with parents who have been oppressed for many decades. Black women and those who have been the ‘other’, and the marginalised in society – that’s who I wanted to support, and that was more important than my discomfort about speaking out.”

It would be impossible for me to understand every visual reference in this video, there were three aspects that stood out to me:

First, the video visually explores the idea of power. One website interprets this visual depiction as follows: “Janelle sits atop a throne reminiscent of West African royalty, surrounded by black women in studded leather jackets and shades… It’s a marriage of African and African American—shared blackness interpreted in a rap song.”

This visual theme compliments lyrics like,

We gave you life, we gave you birth
We gave you God, we gave you Earth
We fem the future, don’t make it worse
You want the world? Well, what’s it worth?

Second, another prevailing visual theme was Monáe’s outfit: the tuxedo. At one point the lyrics say, “Remember when they used to say I look too mannish, Black girl magic, y’all can’t stand it…”

Monica Miller writes in the Journal of Contemporary African Art, “Described by Monáe variously as a “superhero uniform,” a “weapon,” “armour,” and essential for her “time travel,” the tuxedo seems, above all, to be a vehicle for promulgating progressive ideologies of race, gender, and sexuality.” She goes on, “[Monáe] creates wildly inventive visual narratives for her music in which her body and its tuxedo are worked in the service of revising oppressive histories and creating alternative futures.”

Third, the album in general celebrates and de-stigmatizes the female body. The image below appears only once in the video, accompanying the lyrics, “…And hit the mute button, Let the vagina have a monologue.”

The lyrics themselves send the message that men need to listen to women; that women demand the space to be heard and acknowledged. The visual reference itself may come from from Sebastian Lelio’s film “A Fantastic Woman,” about a transgender woman whose identity is at odds with the identity ascribed to her by society. However, an even earlier source for these references may be a photograph by Armen Ordjanian. Eric Kohn writes, “Ordjanian’s photograph is a feminist meditation on a woman seeing her identity reflected in her physicality, while the shot in Lelio’s movie implies the feelings of a woman whose gender identity transcends the limitations society imposes on her, and Monaé seems to be exhibiting a more explicit message of female empowerment in a vicious battle of the sexes.” Clearly Monaé’s use of this image, and previous meanings associated with this image reinforce her dialogue on female identity, empowerment, and resistance.

Unsurprisingly, the Youtube comments for “Django Jane” are overwhelmingly positive:

Monáe says, Dirty Computer is a gift that I feel very honored and privileged to give. I hope that all the Dirty Computers around the world feel heard, feel seen, and feel celebrated.”

“Like A Prayer” Controversy

Madonna burst onto the public scene in 1984 with her hit song “Borderline.” She quickly gained popularity and began to cause controversy with her “inappropriate” behavior. For example,she posed nude for Penthouse Magazine, creating “raunchy” fashion trends for young teenage girls, and making trashy movies that completely flopped. Her songs and music videos are no exception, with her new and innovative style. This blog will focus on her hit “Like A Prayer,” which definitely has its share of controversy.   

The first section that caught my eye when watching the music video was the image of the burning crosses while Madonna sings to the camera. When I first saw this section I instantly stood up from my chair and called my friend in the room because I couldn’t believe it. The cross is the symbol of Christianity and is a serious symbol that is normally not to be messed with (like a national flag). Seeing the cross engulfed in fire, symbolizing a destructive force, is very disturbing whether you are christian or not because we are always taught to not degrade one’s beliefs. Not only are the crosses burning behind her, but she isn’t even doing anything to stop it, therefore she’s a cross burner! I’m then conflicted because at this point the only time i’ve seen crosses burning have been related to depictions of the the Ku Klux Klan, which brings me to my next point.

Another controversial topic during the time period of this video is the scene where Madonna is being caressed and kissed by a man of color. While I personally feel that love has no boundaries, most people in America think otherwise. Unfortunately, the depiction of the white woman being the essence of true beauty was very strong during this time period, hence why you would never see a depiction of a white man and a black woman. Personally, I am inclined to believe that Madonna is in love with this man given that she sings “I hear you call my name, and it feels like home.” This makes me believe that when she hears this man’s name it makes her comfortable and feel safe as she lays on the ground in front of him almost as if his presence acts as her security.

The next scene that catches my eye is the scene of her randomly falling from the sky..At this point the lyrics she sings are

I hear your voice, it’s like an angel sighing

I have no choice, I hear your voice

Feels like flying

I close my eyes, oh God I think I’m falling

Out of the sky, I close my eyes

Heaven help me

This leads me to believe that her love for this man is almost a religious emotion. The symbol of her falling from the sky proves how hard she is falling in love. Strangely enough a priest eventually catches her and propels her back up into the sky.

Lastly, I would like to focus on the most important scene in my opinion which is the portrayal of Madonna witnessing a group of white men abusing a woman. Suddenly, the “Jesus” like black male enters the scene, however now he is dressed in normal human like clothing. As the man runs to rescue the woman the white men flee the scene leaving him alone with her. When the police finally get to the site they assume that the black man has committed the crime and arrest him, all while Madonna watches from a distance. I personally believe that Madonna wanted to include this in the video to make the statement that people of color have a terrible reputation of being criminals and even this “Jesus” like figure was misunderstood.

‘treaty’ by Yothu Yindi

For thousands of years before Lieutenant James Cook “discovered” Australia, more than 500 Indigenous nations consisting of over 750,000 people had already been living harmoniously on the land. They believed that Human, Animal, Plant and land is part of one vast unchanging network of relationships that was established before they even existed. Unlike the Europeans, they believed that the land owns mankind, not the other way around. Sadly, on 22 August 1770, Lieutenant Cook stumbled across this land, stuck a flag on the ground and claimed it to be a part of the British Empire. Aboriginal people were stripped of their human and land rights and suffered from discrimination, and violence for hundreds of years.  

Despite the absolutely harrowing and irreversible pain they have inflicted on Aboriginal people, Australia remains the only commonwealth country to have never signed a treaty with its indigenous people. The lack of a treaty insinuates the lack of recognition of indigenous people’s history and prior occupation of the land, and the lack of a firm, functional relationship between Indigenous people and non-Indigenous Australians. In 1988, former Prime Minister of Australia, Bob Hawke, signed the Barunga statement proposed by the leaders of the Australian Indigenous community and promised that a treaty would be delivered by 1990. The Barunga statement called for the Australian Government to recognise Indigenous sovereignty, their basic human rights and respect for the Aboriginal identity and culture. However, despite Hawke’s promise, there were no signs of change, let alone a treaty. In 1991, the band Yothu Yindi collaborated with musician Paul Kelly to compose ‘Treaty’ to protest against the government’s broken promise and to raise public awareness about it.

Yothu Yindi were an Australian musical group that was a merger of a white rock group and an Aboriginal folk group from Yolngu homelands. The lyrics of ‘Treaty’ consist of both English and Yolngu Matha, the native language of the Yolngu. This is the lyrics to the song:

Well I heard it on the radio 
And I saw it on the television
Back in 1988, all those talking politicians

Words are easy, words are cheap
Much cheaper than our priceless land
But promises can disappear
Just like writing in the sand

Treaty yeah treaty now treaty yeah treaty now

Nhima djatpangarri nhima walangwalang (You dance djatpangarri, that’s better)
Nhe djatpayatpa nhima gaya’ nhe marrtjini yakarray (You’re dancing, you improvise, you keep going, wow)
Nhe djatpa nhe walang gumurrt jararrk gutjuk (You dance djatpangarri, that’s good my dear paternal grandson)

This land was never given up
This land was never bought and sold
The planting of the union jack
Never changed our law at all
Now two river run their course
Seperated for so long
I’m dreaming of a brighter day
When the waters will be one

Treaty yeah, treaty now (x2)

Nhima gayakaya nhe gaya’ nhe (You improvise, you improvise)
Nhe gaya’ nhe marrtjini walangwalang nhe ya (You improvise, you keep going, you’re better)
Nhima djatpa nhe walang (You dance djatpangarri, that’s good)
Gumurr-djararrk yawirriny’ (My dear young men)
Nhe gaya’ nhe marrtjini gaya’ nhe marrtjini (You improvise, you keep improvising, you keep going)
Gayakaya nhe gaya’ nhe marrtjini walangwalang (Improvise, you improvise, you keep going, that’s better)
Nhima djatpa nhe walang (You dance djatpangarri, that’s good)
Gumurr-djararrk nhe yå, e i, e i, e i i i, i i i, i i i, i i (You dear things)

Treaty ma’ (Treaty now)

Promises disappear – priceless land – destiny
Well I heard it on the radio
And I saw it on the television
But promises can be broken
Just like writing in the sand

Treaty yeah treaty now treaty yeah treaty now (x2)
Treaty yeah treaty ma treaty yeah treaty ma (x2)

yothu yindi performing ‘treaty’ at ARIAs

What makes this song so unique and impactful is the combination of both aboriginal and balanda (non-Aboriginal) musical cultures. The lead singer, Mandawuy Yunupingu commented “Though it borrows from rock ‘n’ roll, the whole structure of ‘Treaty’ is driven by the beat of the djatpangarri that I’ve incorporated in it. It was an old recording of this historic djatpangarri that triggered the song’s composition.” The instrumentation used in this song includes both western instruments such as electric guitars, keyboard and drums, and traditional indigenous instruments such as yidaki (didgeridoo) and bilma (ironwood clapsticks). The song is composed with the western twelve-note chromatic scale, and so harmony is more controlled by electric guitar and keyboard. Traditional aboriginal instruments focus more on timbre rather than harmony, and adds a distinct, irreplaceable tone quality to the song.

The ‘Filthy Lucre’, Melbourne-based dance remixers, let out a remix of ‘Treaty’, and that led the song to gain international recognition. The remix peaked at No.11 on the Australian Recording Industry Association singles charts, and was the 29th best-selling song in Australia in 1991. It was performed by Yothu Yindi at the Closing Ceremony of the Sydney Olympics on 1 October 2000.

‘Treaty’ is an upbeat song with mainly major tonality, despite the heavy issue that it addresses. Perhaps this is to express their hopefulness for a brighter future despite their current gloomy situation. Unfortunately, to this day there is still no treaty. Although on the surface it may seem like Aboriginal Australians are given equal rights as non-indigenous Australians, the social, educational and economic gap is huge but not much is being done to close it. A treaty is long, long overdue and it is absolutely necessary to the future of Australia’s relationship with its indigenous peoples. I hope “treaty yeah treaty now” happens in the very very near future.

link to the song:

Bibliography:

http://www.aboriginalart.com.au/culture/dreamtime2.html
https://aiatsis.gov.au/collections/collections-online/digitised-collections/treaty/barunga-statement

https://australianstogether.org.au/discover/the-wound/the-lack-of-treaty/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barunga,_Northern_Territory#The_Barunga_Statement

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/read-the-lyrics-of-yothu-yindi-song-treaty
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-40024622

How the Honorable Kendrick Lamar Pimped a Butterfly

For generations, music has been used as a political tool, giving power to groups of people that otherwise may be powerless. For the black community this has been the case since the first slave ships arrived in “the land of the free”. Our ancestors sang spirituals on the ships that ripped them from their homeland. They sang as they worked the land that they were forced to adopt. They sang as they marched, rallied, and drove hundreds of miles through the South. And now we sing, but we also rap. Over the last several decades hip hop has become the predominant social, economic, and political voice of the African-American community in music. From “its birth in the 70’s” to its entrance into mainstream culture in the 90’s and continued evolution today, hip-hop tells some of the narratives found inside the ‘African-American’ community. No artist better represents this then the honorable Kendrick Lamar whose album ‘To Pimp A Butterfly’ covers a wide array of racial issues from police brutality and mass incarceration to gang violence, black on black crime and mental illness as a result of systematic oppression.

Click here to see the honorable Kendrick Lamar himself explain some of the themes of TPAB:

Kendrick Lamar’s political platform arises from his many years of living in Compton California. His father Kenny Ducksworth, was a former member of the street gang Gangster Disciples and was allegedly a drug dealer in Compton. His mother Paula Oliver is originally from Chicago Illinois and had Kendrick 3 years after arriving in Compton in the hopes of avoiding gang violence. Unfortunately, Compton in the 1990’s suffered from the rivalry of two of the largest gangs ever formed in US history, the Bloods and the Crips. Respectively, at their peak the membership of the gangs numbered more than 10,000. In this community Lamar began his musical and poetic journey. He released his first album at age 16 and soon after signed to Top Dawg Entertainment. He steadily gained a following collaborating with many other West coast rappers including Snoop Dogg, Busta Rhymes, and Dr.Dre who he eventually signed with after the release of his critically acclaimed 2011 Section 8.0. The rest is history.

Although biographical information can feel trivial when reading, and writing, to understand the message Kendrick Lamar delivers on TPAB is impossible without some insight into his background. His musical voice addresses the “reasons, and problems, and solutions” to the social and economic problems of black people in Compton because he is legitimately from Compton. Kendrick lamar is not an outsider of the community exploiting hip hop music for celebrity status. He’s a concerned, active member of his community looking to shed some insight on life in Compton. Kendrick considers himself a “writer” who has “to connect to the music” in order to have it speak the truths he’s been told in conversation. It seems that for the honorable Kendrick Lamar music is not just a means of communicating stories but a sort of therapy for all the pain and loss he’s experienced in Compton. Mental health and its impact on  impoverished neighborhoods and communities as it pertains to black people specifically, is often overlooked. This album is one of few since the birth of hip hop to subliminally outline the PTSD, depression, and other forms of mental illness one can experience form living in communities full of violence and drug abuse. In TPAB one hears the multiple voices of Kendrick Lamar engage in dialogues with himself and with a symbolic Lucifer over depression, leadership, suicide, and “survivors guilt’ as Lamar calls it.

Click here to watch the honorable Kendrick Lamar explain his mental health as it pertains to music

Kendrick Lamar’s rise to fame wasn’t so much “straight from the bottom” as the song King Kunta may suggest but a testament to his wanting to rise above the violence he saw in ganglife. His contribution to the African-American community as a witness and political activist has had a stunning impact on society as a whole. The honorable Kendrick Lamar is considered one of the best if not the best rapper in the World. His performances continue to astound audiences everywhere while delivering powerful social commentary that cannot be ignored. His use of music to create a platform from which to share the Compton experience is unrivaled in its authenticity, creativity, and power.

We Insist!: Max Roach’s Bold Call for Freedom

“A revolution is unfurling-America’s unfinished revolution. It is unfurling in lunch counters, buses, libraries and schools-wherever the dignity and potential of men are denied. Youth and idealism are unfurling. Masses of Negroes are marching onto the stage of history and demanding their freedom now!” These fiery words from Civil Rights leader John Philip Randolph capture the call to revolution in the 1950s and 60s. The United States were in upheaval as Black Americans fought for equality in a nation which claims that “All men are created equal.” Around the nation, freedom fighters were participating in sit-ins, boycotts, and other forms of protest. In 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat, in 1957, the Little Rock Nine braved the harassment of their school, and in 1960, Max Roach recorded an album that would prove to be a jazz anthem the revolution happening all around him.

John Phillip Randolph, the Civil Rights Leader who’s words appear in the “Freedom Now!” liner notes (biography.com)

Max Roach was a virtuoso jazz drummer, a legend to this day. But the jazz stars of the 1950s and 1960s were not excluded from the harsh reality of racism and segregation. The copyright system was set up so that songwriters and producers gained the biggest checks. This left performers with little compensation for their talents. The American Federation of Musicians (AFM), which controlled access to the biggest gigs and venues, had been segregated since it’s founding. The AFM also controlled radio contracts, and made sure that white bands were favored in local and national broadcasts. In fact, it wasn’t until 1946 that Nat King Cole broke the prime time radio color barrier. Jazz musicians of the caliber of Sarah Vaughn and Cab Calloway were beaten by police and civilians alike. So although jazz musicians received some measure of status, they understood and experienced racism and segregation just like the rest of the black population.

The Album Cover to “We Insist!” depicts a sit-in, with three black men sitting at a what is most likely a white bar

It was into this scene that Max Roach inserted his musical call for freedom, the legendary album, “We Insist! The Freedom Now Suite!” The album had been politically motivated from the beginning. The liner notes suggest that the NAACP had hired Roach and vocalist Oscar Brown Jr. to write a piece for the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, which would occur in 1963. Although the Brown/Roach collaboration would be ended due to differing political views, the theme of freedom remained. Roach was joined by Vocalist Abbey Lincoln (who would be his wife from 1962-1970) and a star-studded cast of instrumentalists such as Booker Little (trumpet) and Julian Priester (trombone). The album captures Roach’s transition to the be-bop jazz-club scene to the harsher, grittier avant-garde style of the 1960s. This transition suits the harsh subject matter extremely well and provides a powerful picture of his world. The liner notes begin with the revolutionary quote from John Phillip Randolph. Roach and company were intentional about getting their message across. They wanted freedom, and they wanted it now.

The Album is composed as a chronological history of black culture in the US. “Driva Man” is a reference to pre-civil war slavery; “Freedom Day” recalls the excitement, anticipation and tension of Emancipation Day; “Triptych: Prayer, Protest, Peace” paints a vivid picture of the troubles blacks experienced in both the US and Africa; “All Africa” is a celebration of African culture; and “Tears for Johanassburg” is a response to the Sharpeville Massacre in South Africa.

A live version of “Freedom Day” performed in 1964. In this version, Roach plays a powerful solo near the beginning of the tune.

The performances on the album are all noteworthy, showcasing extreme virtuosity and expression. Particularly, “Freedom Day”, the most arranged tune on the album, stands out. Although the melody is simple, the tempo is absolute breakneck. Roach manages to keep up with this extreme tempo throughout, and provides a beautifully motivic and powerful solo near the end of the song. He begins simply, and then builds these simple motives to a thundering conclusion. Equally impressive is Little’s trumpet solo. Despite the extreme tempo, Little provides a fiery solo that is motivically sound and technically impressive. The tutti sections before and after the solo sections is particularly effective thanks to the powerful bass pedals that change shift under the dense chords of the horns. The lyrics, sung hauntingly by Lincoln, show an absolute disbelief that freedom day has come. This can be seen as powerful commentary of current events in the 50s and 60s. Although the Emancipation Proclamation provided some measure of freedom, true freedom still evaded black Americans. Roach himself stated that “we don’t really understand what it really is to be free. The last song we did, “Freedom Day” ended with a question mark.” This explains the mournful quality in a tune which subject matter would suggest jubilation.

The original Album version of Freedom Day
Max Roach and Abbey Lincoln

Indeed, “We Insist!” provided a turning point for Roach. After it’s release, he told Downbeat that “I will never again play anything that does not have social significance. We American jazz musicians of African descent have proved beyond all doubt that we’re master musicians of our instruments. Now what we have to do is employ our skill to tell the dramatic story of our people and what we’ve been through.” Roach’s call for freedom has not gone unheard. Although it was not well received, a tendency of avant-garde music, time has treated it well. The Guardian hailed it as a “landmark jazz album”  and Penguin Guide to Jazz gave the album a rare crown accolade. To this day, his message applies as the United States still seeks to sift through generations of racism and abuse. Perhaps we can think of “We Insist!” as Max Roach’s version of kneeling during the national anthem, championed infamously by Colin Kaepernick. Similar to Kaepernick, Roach used his status to make a bold and obvious political statement. Both Kaepernick and Roach were not well received at first, but both succeeded in getting their point across, whether or not the public was ready. Roach believed that music was political, and did not hesitate to use his talents for his cause. And sathough it is close to its 60th birthday, “We Insist!” still relates to current events and can still inspire and inform a new generation of jazz lovers and Americans.

More live music from Freedom Now Suite