The Bassoon Reed

The bassoon reed: so small, yet so capable of ruining my life. The bassoon reed is one of the few pieces of technology that makes life difficult just as often as it makes life easy. Every bassoonist knows the struggle: you spend hours on one reed, only to find out that it is not, and never will be, very good.

At the foundation of the bassoon reed is a plant called Arundo donax, or, more commonly, “giant reed.” Once it’s harvested and sent to bassoonists, it’s generally referred to as “cane.” It is an invasive species and grows all over the world, but most of the cane used for bassoon reeds is grown in France. That may seem like an oddly specific, arbitrary location, but there actually is a difference in the makeup of the plant depending on the region in which it grows. Arundo donax contains certain percentages of natural minerals and chemicals that serve to protect it from insects. One of these minerals is silica (a glass-like mineral that gives a piece of cane strength), and the amount of it that is in the cane dictates whether or not it is usable for the purpose of reed making. Too much means the cane will be too stiff to vibrate (making it very difficult to make a sound), and too little means that it vibrates much too easily and will probably sound similar to a kazoo. Basically, there are only certain regions in which cane grows in an ideal way for reed making, and France just so happens to have ideal growing conditions.

Arundo donax before harvest

When the cane first reaches the bassoonist, it looks nothing like a reed. At this point in the process (wherein the only thing done to the cane has been harvesting it and cutting it into sections about one foot tall), it pretty closely resembles a bamboo shoot.


Tube bassoon cane after harvest. Likely what a professional bassoonist would be purchasing for reed making.

This is where the manual labor begins for the bassoonist. To put it simply, the tube has to be split into four equal pieces and cut to a precise length, and the inside material has to be scooped out and thinned. At this point, the cane has undergone what is called the gouging process, and it looks like this:

Gouged bassoon cane

The cane then undergoes a series of transformations during which it begins to look like a reed. These would be boring and confusing to explain, but this video of Abe Weiss (the former principal bassoonist of the RPO) does a good job of demonstrating the steps. The first half of this video is about the steps involved in processing cane, and the second half is about finishing the reed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsK54ZoHzlU

How someone chooses to finish a reed depends on a variety of factors. These factors include things like where they live, who they study with, and what kind of playing they plan on doing. According to George Sakakeeny in his book, Making Reeds from Start to Finish, there are three main styles of reed making which all suit different needs.

The first distinct reed style is the Garfield style. This type of reed is rare and mostly found in North America. It is named for Bernard Garfield, who developed it in the mid-twentieth century while playing in the Philadelphia Orchestra. The goal of this reed type was to achieve a darker sound that was easy to control for orchestral playing. Over the years it has fallen out of favor, mostly because it does not project well. The other two reed styles don’t have special names. One is used mainly in North America and tends to elicit a brighter sound from the bassoon. This type of reed is good for solo and principal orchestral playing. The third is used pretty much everywhere outside of North America, and elicits a darker sound from the bassoon. While there are three “main” styles of bassoon reeds, every individual adjusts their reeds to suit their needs in so specific of a way that almost no two people’s reeds are the same.

In terms of development, the bassoon reed hasn’t really changed since…pretty much ever. Even dulcians (the precursors to bassoons) used reeds that look similar to ones bassoonists use today. Obviously there are differences in things like shape and size, but the general structure of the bassoon reed doesn’t seem to have gotten an update in over 300 years.

A dulcian, circa 1700, with reed and bocal

Making a reed out of organic material, however, can be a frustrating task given how inconsistent plants can be. This means reed making ends up being an incredibly time-consuming task since at least half of all reeds are not suitable to be played and have to be thrown out. As a result, modern companies are trying to find a synthetic material that will work just as well as traditional bassoon cane. The forerunner in this industry right now is Légère, which has created a synthetic reed that, all things considered, functions pretty well. That being said, they are not widely accepted in the bassoon world yet. Reed making is honestly a pretty culty thing, so much so that people tend to look down upon people who don’t make their own reeds. Steve Paulson, the principal bassoonist of the San Francisco Symphony even said, “I’m almost reluctant to reveal publicly how much I am enjoying the experience. As good as these reeds are, I’m sure that even the folks at Legere understand that it will take a long time to have synthetic reeds accepted as mainstream in our worldwide culture of bassoonists, at least among professionals. Prospective conservatory students will want the assurance that a bassoon teacher will continue devote the time and energy to the teaching of cane reed making, as I will, even if the professional happens to be “doing a little Legere on the side”.

Reeds are a vital part of the bassoon playing experience. Without a good reed, there’s no way to play the bassoon to the standard of an orchestra or any ensemble for that matter. They are the most important piece of technology a bassoonist has available to them, and, in the process of being made, the reeds accrue their own history. Through understanding how a reed is made and how specific they are to different people/regional sound preferences, we can gain an appreciation for how bassoonists have adapted this technology to make it meet their individual needs.

The Mellotron; A Distorted History

Each musical genre can be associated with a key instrument; tenor saxophone for Swing and Bebop, electric guitar for Blues and Rock, and the synthesizer for 80’s pop. With this in mind, what timbres accurately depicts the past decade of music? There isn’t exactly one sound that can fit this criteria and this is a result of the emergence of samplers in modern music production. 

Of course sampling dates back to far before rappers and DJ’s had instant sampling and real time loops on portable digital devices. Sampling technology began with utilizing tape recordings in the 1940’s with Henry Chamberlin’s invention of the Model 100 Rhythmate. This instrument played a selection of pre-recorded drum loops on a tape reel so that users could play along with it on other instruments. After a few different versions of the Rhythmate along with the addition of a keyboard and recordings of violins, woodwinds, and choirs, the first Mellotron was born (http://egrefin.free.fr/eng/mellotron/melhist.php)

Mellotron Mark I

Alike most things in life, the Mellotron was not perfect to begin with. In an “Poor Man’s Mellotron” Bruce Harvie shares his experience with his own mellotron; “I have to warm mine up for an hour or two to get it to where it will play back the tape banks without warbling, and even then it’s dicey as to whether or not it will play the notes clearly.” Clearly, it takes a bit more than just owning a mellotron to be able to use it effectively. “Mine has trumpet, French horn, violin, cello, and the wonderful sound of individual men’s and woman’s voices… and that’s it!” he further shares. 

Harvie recounts the instrumentation of his mellotron as a downside, but for producers and songwriters, this was more than enough to spark creativity. Just listen to iconic Beatles cut, “Strawberry Fields Forever,” which begins with a mellotron that plays a recording of a flute.

Being limited to the option of a flute mellotron helped the fab four bring this tune to life in a way that could not have otherwise been imagined. The warm sound of the warbling, distorted tape disguises the fact that the recording is the sound of a flute, and creates a sound that is entirely unique. Voice and string Mellotrons are notorious for creating dense atmospheric textures, which can be heard in British Progressive Rock outfit Genesis’ “Dancing With The Moonlit Knight.”

The Mellotron sampling a choir can be heard at 3:45

Countless recordings have been made legendary by the sound of Mellotron’s. It became a staple of several artists in the 70’s, most notably on David Bowie’s “Space Oddity,” Led Zeppelin’s “Kashmir” Tangerine Dream’s ambient and illustrious “Phaedra.” (http://ultimateclassicrock.com/mellotron-songs/)

Naturally, borrowing pieces of music has evolved. During the 80’s, hip hop artists began using vinyl records to sample recordings. Alike the tape on a Mellotron, the warbling sound of vinyl maintained the warm analog sound in sampling (https://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/music-sampling1.htm). The production of Mellotrons was put to a halt in 1986 due to the invention of digital samplers taking over the market. Fast forward to the 21st century to see Roland’s invention of the SP404, allowing users to record digital samples with a built in microphone and even apply reverb, chorus, and filters to them. (https://www.roland.com/us/products/sp-404sx/)

Despite this convenient technology, many still prefer the unique texture that a mellotron creates. Johnny Greenwood of Radiohead has discussed his own impressions of the Mellotron, “It didn’t sound like any other keyboard. Instead there was a choir, and a weird, fucked-up sort of choir. I love the fact that the notes run out after a few seconds.” As a true testimony of the influence such a unique instrument had on even future generations, various Mellotron’s can be heard throughout the band’s 1997 masterpiece album, “OK Computer.” (https://www.spin.com/2017/06/radiohead-jonny-greenwood-genesis-paranoid-android-ok-computer/)

While digital samplers continue to dominate the scene, there is still a market for the iconic sound of a Mellotron. Just this past weekend at the 2019 NAMM convention, Quilter Labs unveiled The Panoptigon, a machine which plays floppy discs and allows users to manipulate the pitch of the audio, quite reminiscent of the sound of a Mellotron; https://reverb.com/news/video-quilters-panoptigon-brings-back-the-optical-disc-instrument

EWI: The musical instrument of the future

The EWI, otherwise known as an electronic wind instrument, is a technological invention that has made a huge impact on many different genres of music and has a recent history that is often overlooked.

The History of the Instrument:

It all started in 1981, with inventor Nyle Steiner. In its first stages, the EWI was made by hand, and was essentially an analog controller that didn’t have very many sounds other than the ones built in. The top of the EWI contains sensors inside the mouthpiece that measures how much wind is being blown into the instrument and would change the volume. The front of the instrument was made of non-movable buttons/parts on the front. On the back close to the mouthpiece, there is a series of metal rollers that would allow the user to control the octave register with their thumb.

The front of the EWI
The back of the EWI

Shortly after being created, its increasing popularity caused some of the users to carry lots of extra equipment in order to create extra sounds as well as cords that made the it compatible with other synthesizers. The solution to that problem came when Steiner integrated the MIDI box into the EWI in 1985. This allowed the it to be more compatible with commonly used samplers and mimicked any real sound the user wanted to make. That is why the instrument itself was so versatile, including it’s ability to program different fingerings (for brass instruments or saxophone) that are more familiar to users.

Once Steiner was no longer able to make the EWI’s by hand, he went to Akai Professional who were already working on their own digital sampler at the time with music instrument company Electroharmonix, and made a deal for the prototype to be mass produced. It continued to be revised over the years to improve its technological abilities and playing ability. The most recent model, the Akai EWI 5000 was revealed in 2014, and even contains its own soundboard to change reverb, delay, chorus, and pitches. It features the same button/octave mechanics as the original but in a much slimmer form containing more advanced technology, and more patch sounds.

The Akai EWI 5000 model

The EWI and Michael Brecker:

The most prominent figure in the early advancement of the EWI was virtuoso jazz/fusion saxophonist, Michael Brecker. He used the it as a platform to expand the range of sounds possible on a MIDI controller, as well as a tool for improvisation in a jazz/fusion related context. He even used it as a solo unaccompanied instrument in some contexts, looping certain sections as well as harmonize itself to create sounds representing an entire ensemble. Considering the more common pop/dance/jazz fusion sounds that existed in the 1980’s, I would consider the EWI groundbreaking in terms of surpassing what people thought was musically possible.

The first major breakthrough for the EWI occurred when Michael Brecker performed Steps Ahead in Tokyo in 1986, only five years after the it was invented. It features the EWI’s full technological capability with the help of extraneous pedals/synthesizers/foot switches to create a plethora of futuristic sounds. All the way up until 3:33, it is just Michael Brecker alone venturing into fascinating harmonic depths.

Another example would include my favorite piece featuring the EWI: Original Rays on Michael Brecker’s Michael Brecker (1987). It is also plugged into an Oberheim Xpander (a six voice keyless interval generator/analog synthesizer). The notes that are being played on the EWI are marked as pink, and the color coated chunks mark each time the Oberheim Xpander generates a new set of six intervals harmonizing the main note.

One last example, just because Michael Brecker is that awesome, is the song Itsbynne Reel on Don’t Try this at Home (1988). It showcases the EWI in a different context as described in the liner notes by George Varga: “The opening section, ‘Itsbynne Reel’ begins with a vigorous traditional Irish-reel-cum bluegrass duet between Brecker on EWI and violinist O’Connor before leading into a driving, harmonized vamp…” It’s not the typical setting for an electronic instrument with violin, but it totally works and that is the best part. The EWI is not just limited to jazz or fusion music, it can go anywhere if it fits the context. I also highly recommend listening to the rest of the track, it’s quite unbelievable.

EWI in the context of contemporary music:
Although the EWI became more popular among other users, more artists became critical over its legitimacy in music after Michael Brecker didn’t use the it as often in the 1990’s. Despite that, there are a lot of musicians that continued to use it at a very high level, one of them being Bob Mintzer. There is a group called the Yellowjackets that features him on the saxophone and on a more recent model of the instrument. One of my favorite snippets of the group is them performing in Stockholm in 2009, showcasing the amount of technical ability that can be achieved while being musical and assimilating vocabulary from the blues/jazz.

EWI as its own instrument:

As awesome as the EWI can sound, people often mistake it as being too similar to being able to play an acoustic instrument, specifically the saxophone, clarinet and flute. As described in an article regarding technique and expressivity on EWI, the reason why the it is incredible is because it requires its own technical mastery, completely separate from any other instrument. That is why people often experiment with the EWI, but do not get past the early stages. One major difference is that the buttons are touch sensitive, as opposed to physical finger buttons that can be pressed down or tone holes that can be covered as well. It is essential that the finger movement is clean and precise. If users are not paying attention, their fingers can be easily touching buttons and swirling between notes that were not intended. Another challenging concept is the touch sensitive thumb roller for the octave register. It is not the same as producing the upper and lower harmonics on an acoustic instrument. If users aren’t careful, the thumb can easily roll quickly between octaves and creates a huge whirlpool of morphed unintentional sounds. There are also seven/eight octaves on the instrument, which is a lot more than usual acoustical instruments are accustomed to having. Figuring out how to properly incorporate this huge range on the instrument into music can be very challenging as well. The continuing capabilities of the EWI include pitch bend, vibrato, and glissandos is not as easy to use in context as users might think. The mouthpiece is also made of hard rubber, which can feel much different than actively vibrating a reed or buzzing in a brass mouthpiece. As an EWI 5000 user myself, I absolutely love the instrument, but the technical challenges are certainly apparent.

EWI and its place in music today:

One issue that the EWI ran into at the beginning of its development is that it was considered as a replacement for 80’s jazz/pop saxophone. This limited the usage and its credibility to be continually used in other contexts. I believe that the EWI should be treated as its own instrument and should be assimilated into any musical context of which is appropriate. Considering that it is somewhat like a technological version of what an acoustic wind instrument, it is very unique and has a futuristic/contemporary feeling to it. It can certainly push the boundaries of what is possible in music and can also yield to the creation of other music niches/genres in the future.

Sources:

https://www.patchmanmusic.com/JoelPeskinEWIStory.html

The EWI

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/penny-will/the-amazing-ewi_b_1746317.html

http://www.gwhitty.com/ewi.html

https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=oa_dissertations

Varga, G. (1988). [Liner notes]. In Dont Try this at Home [Vinyl, LP]. New York: Impulse record label, MCA Records, Inc.

Do Drum Machines Have Souls?

That is often the question.

Do drum machines provide a source for “Sexual Healing”? Lets ask Marvin Gaye.

Do drum machines put you in a “Love Lockdown” or say “Welcome to Heartbreak”?  Kanye West knows the answer. 

Maybe drum machines will have you joining Whitney Houston in saying “I wanna Dance with somebody” or better yet, have you screaming “Yeah!” with Lil Jon and Usher.

In the tracks referenced above, there was one specific drum machine behind it all. The Roland TR-808 revolutionized the way music was created and heard. It provided a whole new interface for artists and producers to be creative. It brought forth an entire soundscape that did not exist prior to 1980 and revolutionized the way we hear rhythm and beats.

History of Roland

Ikutaro Kalehashi, aka Mr. K, was born in Osaka Japan in 1930. As a kid he studied mechanical engineering eventually working for a company called Ace Electronics. There he helped manufacture what were called “Combo Rhythm Units”. These were early drum machines programmed into organs providing the organist with a beat in the case of no other musicians present. Some of the earliest recordings of drum machines were from artists such as Sly and the Family Stone and Timmy Thomas utilizing these rhythm units. In continuing his interests of electronic musical instruments, Mr. K founded the Roland Corporation in 1972. https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/3/15162488/roland-tr-808-music-drum-machine-revolutionized-music

Like anything revolutionary or new, people didn’t understand the TR-808 when first released in 1980. However, the machine was unique to anything else on the market. The sounds produced were synthetic and not natural. They sounded as if from outer space or from the future. People were confused. https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/3/15162488/roland-tr-808-music-drum-machine-revolutionized-music

The New York Scene

In the underground scene of New York City, the sound was about mixing records and spinning vinyl in clubs. In 1981 the game was changed when one man introduces the 808 sounds to the world. Afrika Bambaatta was already mixing artists such as James Brown, Sly and the Family Stone, and Kraftwork together through being a dj, and with help of producer, Arthur Baker, the song “Planet Rock” was recorded for Tommy Boy records. Soon, the sounds of the 808 were being played throughout the New York Clubs. The most noticeable sound of the track was the low end of the bass. No one had ever heard a bass sound of that magnitude before the 808.

Sexual Healing

The next major event to occur in the life of the 808 is when Marvin Gaye chooses to make a career move. Struggling with happiness in his life, Gaye decides to move to Belgium and escape the struggles of family, drug abuse, as well as remove himself from the Motown sound. He went into the studio with a new, stripped down writing style, and a vision. With the 808, he created a groove and was adamant about that one sound. After recording his vocals over the 808 loop, Marvin Gaye transformed the 808 sound into his number one selling track of all time helping him receive his only ever Grammy Award. The track “Sexual Healing” helped bring the sounds of the 808 into the pop music world in 1982.

After the breach into the pop music world, the Roland TR-808 sound began to bridge the gap between multitudes of genres and city scenes from the Miami bass music scene, to Atlanta, New Orleans, Chicago and even across the seas to Europe. One of the most revolutionary producers to utilize the 808 is Rick Rubin, co-founder of Def Jam Records and co-president of Columbia records. Rubin is known for his discovery of using the 808 for a bass line. He found out a way to maximize the sustain sound and tune the pitches allowing for the creation of a bass line. Artists such as LL Cool J, The Beastie Boys, Run DMC, and Public Enemy can be attributed to the work of Rick Rubin and the 808. Rubin developed the sound of American hip hop with the help of the iconic drum machine. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Rick-Rubin

3 years of never ending influence

Between the year 1980 and 1983, Roland produced and sold 12,000 machines. The way the machine was developed, Mr. K, chose to utilize the defective transistors in the analog circuit because it created a unique buzzing sound. As technology improved, access to these specific transistors diminished. Rather than changing the formula, Mr. K. stopped all production of the TR-808. Even though only a limited amount were created, the Roland TR-808 changed music forever. As a listener you cannot turn on the radio without hearing a track consisting of 808 sounds or influence. Artist still use it today. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/8-ways-the-808-drum-machine-changed-pop-music-249148/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2268622/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl

Back to the original question…you could say maybe the faulty transistor is the soul within the 808 drum machine. Maybe it’s the soul within the artist or producer that shines through. All in all though, with the impact the 808 had on music it is easy to say, it has more soul than a ginger like me…

We Don’t Just Blow Into Our Instruments


Can breathing be a technology, and how does our breathing evolve?

When we think of technology, we list off every electronic device that comes to mind, and if we can’t think of any more, then we search on the internet, which is also categorized into the electronic department. But what is rarely thought of as a technology is the body. Your body, my body, everyones body. More specifically, an involuntary function in our body: the breath. Ok… isn’t technology supposed to be techy or something? No. The breath is something we as musicians, and I guess also as human beings, depend on. Technology is something developed and in turn used as a way to facilitate something, or to make something work. In order to make most of our musical instruments work, we must use an airstream, which needs our breath. We don’t just *breathe* into our instruments — there is a lot of thought that goes into making the airstream. Airstream is a development of our breath; it is something we manipulate for our own use, therefore making it a technology to musicians.

Pneumo Pro Flute airstream device: helps build control of direction of air, and with practice results in a beautiful tone.

We never really wake up and think “oh man maybe I should breathe”, but as musicians, we lock ourselves in practice rooms and obsess and over analyze breathing and airstream; it is no longer involuntary. It dictates intonation, tone, color, vibrancy, pitch accuracy, etc… As a flutist, any pain in my body, stiff jaw, tight chest, wack oral chamber, affects the outcome of my air that I am trying to achieve. So there is a reason to obsess over it — we cannot play our instruments beautifully without it. The development of our breath into airstream has sparked an interest in developing other technologies to even further improve our breath, which in turn helps our airstream, such as variations on the breath builder , breathing bags, finger breathing, and other breathing accessories specific to instrument types, such as the Pneumo Pro for flutists.

Breathing Bag: helps expand lung capacity and controls speed of air being inhaled and released.

It is interesting to think that musicians hold and attend classes that teach you how to breathe. Like, why do I need to sit here for an hour listening to some old guy talk about breathing? Over time, and across the globe, musicians developed different ways of explaining and manipulating breathing. These classes, although sound boring, help us think about breathing and air, rather than doing it mindlessly and involuntarily. I’ve definitely attended classes like these and each time I would freak out because I would suddenly overthink breathing and then I sit there very uncomfortably breathing for the rest of the class, but also I have a new perspective of breathing as a tool for improvement.

But actually productively thinking about how your air moves through your body, then how it moves through your instrument, allows you to develop as a musician, since air has so much to do with playing (which is pretty wild honestly). Usually the longer you play an instrument the more organic this dream airstream becomes (obviously with lots of practice). I breathe everyday and think about my air when I play so I hope maybe someday I’ll have a marvelous airstream too!

  • https://didgeproject.com/free-didgeridoo-lessons/strengthen-breath-expand-lung-capacity-wind-instruments/
  • https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/music/music-instruments-orchestra/woodwinds-music/v/flute-interview-demo
  • http://kimballtrombone.com/breathing/respiratory-training-for-musicians/

Where did my Guts come from?

With it’s glamorous curves, intricate mechanics and gorgeous engravings of endless flowers and angels what’s a harp and it’s frame without its strings? All forty seven strings of guts, wires, and nylons. Despite the harp’s scarcity among orchestras, the same harp that appears in the many fairy tales of our childhoods and stories of national treasure hunts can be traced back to as early as 3000 BC being one of the oldest instruments in recorded history. First originating from the Egyptian bow and arrow, the aesthetics and the mechanics of the harp have long since changed. One of the greatest features of this grand instrument that underwent great change are the strings.

Some of the earliest harps that were made are known to have had strings of “possibly hair and plant fibre” and only eight to ten strings on each harp unlike the harps with forty seven today. Aside from the improvement of the actual instrument’s structure and mechanics, the growth of knowledge and understanding in the production of the actual strings has come a long way. A harp can be forever constant, but its strings are ever changing. No two strings are ever the same and once one breaks, it must be replaced. Through the journey it took for the harp strings of today, harp makers began to question and innovate on many factors; how sound volume could be created best and with what materials, how much tension and length each material needed in order to create a certain pitch. These questions led harp strings to change from common natural resources to more sophisticated materials and processes of production over a span of 5,000 plus years.

From 3000 BC to around 1500 BC the harp moved traveled into Asia from Egypt acquiring new features of pitch bending and different types of string. During this time Egyptians had already discovered how to create gut strings from animal intestines specifically sheep. The earliest appearance of these gut strings date back to as early as 1350 BC. Gut strings are what make the harp have its round and mellow sound. This is extremely impressive because the process of making gut strings is extremely strenuous.

Creating inspirations of sweet harp music, the instrument soon found its way into Europe around the ninth century. By this time the strings had been through many types of harp frames, double action, triangle, etc. Material for harp strings began to change to metals such as copper and brass. A lot of the strings nowadays still use these types of wire strings, specifically in the lower register of the harp. Wire strings in the ninth century created a deeper sound than gut strings and was used predominantly in Celtic music.

Fast forward to the early nineteenth century with now having both wire and gut strings on the harp around the 1940s the nylon strings were added. This is located in the highest register of the harp, giving a bright and light sound to this instrument. Back then europeans used extremely thin metal strings for the high register notes but nylon was made mainstream after its discovery in the 1930s.

Over the span of these years what makes harp strings the strings they are now are not only the days it takes to manufacture strings, but also the past origins of knowledge used to create the string, the ears of the musicians to get the strings at the right thickness and the practice of the string makers to make the string perfect. With the harp being one of the oldest recorded instrument in all of history, we are able to see its transformation over centuries worth of time. Looking at this from a new perspective, the harp strings sitting in my practice room didn’t just come from the company I ordered online from. They trace back to the factory that manufactured it, which then traces back to the people that were taught this practice in Europe, which then traces back to all the musicians and mechanics that made changes to improve this product from harp makers tracing all the way back to the early recorded days of the instrument, in Egypt. That’s wild.

Sources:

http://www.internationalharpmuseum.org/visit/history.html

https://manufacturing.dustystrings.com/blog/inside-shop-making-harp-strings

http://harp.wikia.com/wiki/Harp_Strings

http://harp.wikia.com/wiki/Harp_Strings

Rosin???

Who would’ve thought that rosin played such an important role in playing a stringed instrument? Rosin is the main source of sound when playing a stringed instrument. You might think – isn’t it the bow or the strings of the instrument? Well, without rosin, the bow wouldn’t produce sound when in contact with the strings. Rosin provides a layer of sticky powder that grips the strings to produce sound. The main ingredient of rosin is pine sap, which is extracted from pine trees (obviously).

Image result for pine sap
Pine sap

According to Jim Early, this process of making rosin stays true from more than 70 years ago, using the same tools as the one Pop Sherman. Although the formula and materials have been tinkered around with, the basic techniques remain unchanged. First, he prepares the molds, which usually comes in either rectangular or circular shape boxes and stopped with rubber strips. Then, he mixes Sylvaros, a type of undefined rosin, with beeswax and other “secret ingredients in a pan to heat. As it heats, the texture becomes thicker and stickier and must cool down a little before pouring. When the mixture partially cools, he slowly drizzles the right amount to each mold. After each mold has been filled, he lights each one with a torch. The hot flame helps get rid of more bubbles and keeps the cake crystals clear. Bubbles in the cake would be the maker’s worst nightmare. Also, the type of wood it’s being burned with contributes to the appearance of bubbles. According to Jim Early, sap gum wood releases fewer bubbles than other woods. An interesting quote from Early: “A cake of rosin should spend its useful life not on the shelf but in an instrument case, where a needy player can reach it.” Rosin often gets left unused, and it’s such a waste. I have not gotten to the point where I was able to finish an entire cake of rosin – I want to reach that point one day.

We often hear of the phrase “rosin flying into the air” when seeing someone’s playing. The amount of rosin placed on the bow is crucial also. If there is too much rosin on the bow, the grip would be too tight and you might create a scratchy sound. If there is too little rosin, then the bow will be too slippery on the string and the sound will be too “fluffy.” Also, it has been said that it’s more productive to apply little amounts of rosin to the bow hair everyday, rather than applying a lot at once and not rosin for few days. This is because it will allow the rosin usage to be more evenly distributed rather than chunks at a time.

Usually, darker rosins tend to be stickier and softer – more ideal for cellos and basses. It is usually better suited for the lower strings. On the other hand, lighter rosin is less sticky and harder, which would be better suited for violins and violas. With this being said, any rosin – except for bass rosin – is typically interchangeably used for any instrument.

There are endless types of rosin aside from just dark and light – from gold to silver to amber to copper. This is definitely something I would want to dive deeper into for a better idea of what to use.

Frankly, this is my first time learning about the process of making rosin and the various types of rosin. I always knew that it was made from pine sap, but never dug into the behind-the-scenes process. I’ve always wanted to explore the different types of rosin to find various rosin-string combinations, to find the right sound and resonance for my instrument. I never really cared about the rosin I used honestly, but I think it can really make a big difference. After researching and understanding more about the creation of rosin, I think I am more intrigued to discover and play around with the options I have.

Fun fact, we usually scratch the brand new rosin before using it because the surface is too smooth and doesn’t stick to the bow hair as much.


Sources:

https://www.wqxr.org/story/what-does-rosin-actually-do-violin-bowsh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosin

The Victory of the Valve

Centuries ago, when the horn’s main purpose was merely to signal different hunting strategies in the great outdoors, the thought of it becoming a regular member of the orchestra was utterly blasphemous. Who would want the uncivilized, brash calls of the hunting horn to intrude on the serene melodies of the orchestra?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmQv67CmPf8

Well, through a long process of technological modifications, the horn achieved the ability to express the chromatic melodies of its counterparts. This was due in large to the invention of the valve in 1818, an advancement still present in the instruments played by professionals today.

The Natural Horn

Before going into detail about the process of inventing a valve system for the horn, it is first important to understand its previous form. In the early 1800’s, most of the European horn players played what we today refer to as the “natural horn.” The term “natural” simply implies that the horn player could only produce the notes of the harmonic series that was available to him or her in that specific key of tubing. The harmonic series (or overtone series) is a recurring pattern of notes that exist in the natural world. It begins with a fundamental note, and is followed by a series of partials each doubled in frequency (Bernstein, “Harmonic Series – Explained”).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TlQryUBz3E

The natural horn was in a circular form and had a bell on one end and a mouthpiece on the other (think, for instance, the apple post horn emoji 📯). Different slidable lengths of tubing, known as “crooks,” may be added to the instrument in order to change the key in which the horn sits in. It was discovered by Joseph Hampel that by altering the right hand’s position in the bell, the notes of the harmonic series could be altered chromatically (Tuckwell 26). In the year 1800, Joseph Vandenbroek, a member of the Paris Opera Orchestra, published a treatise on the horn, all based off of Hampel’s discoveries (Tuckwell 28). This hand-stopping technique, along with the introduction of tunable crooks, greatly expanded the possibilities for horn repertoire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upsUkKyo6dQ

The Horn’s Rise in Popularity

Composers such as Mozart, Haydn, and Beethoven took a liking to the natural horn and began implementing ways to unify horn section writing (first and third horns play in a higher register, while second and fourth horns play in a lower register). But as the popularity of the horn increased, composers were largely limited with the music they could write for the natural horn (Gregory, “The Horn in Beethoven Symphonies”). The range of available notes was considerably low, and not every audience member was in favor of the bright color of the hand-stopped pitches.

Technological Experiments

In order to make the process of changing keys more feasible on the horn, J.B. Dupont invented an omnitonic horn in 1815 in which every crook was built into one moveable slide (Gregory 29).


Dupont Omnitonic horn, c. 1818 (Tuckwell 36)

Yeah, that’s a lot of tubing. Clearly, this instrument was extremely heavy and in some cases still required the player to change mouthpiece position. Callcott, born in 1801, tried to popularize a “radius French horn,” but it, too, was very cumbersome (Tuckwell 38).


Radius French horn, Callcott (Tuckwell 38)

The Valve–At Last!

Finally, after much trial and error, Heinrich Stolzel and Friedrich Bluhmel were issued a joint patent for a valve system on April 12, 1818 (Tuckwell 42). Originally, their invention consisted of two piston valves. One of the valves lowered it by semitone and the other by a whole tone. If used together, a note could be lowered a whole minor third. Now, the horn could perform in four different keys without a crook change or right hand movement.

https://gph.is/2AmePHo

This new way of considering the build of horns truly changed the course of the instrument’s future. Later versions of the valve developed, including the vienna valve, and the more common rotary valve (Tuckwell 47-49). But without the Stolzel-Bluhmel patent in 1818, these innovations could have been entirely nonexistent.


An early piston valve (Tuckwell 42)

The invention of the valve changed the future of this instrument—and every brass instrument, for that matter. It largely expanded the possibilities for composers and players alike by allowing a greater range and facility of the instrument. This revolutionary musical technology can definitely be seen as a “victory” because of its continual use in the orchestra today, after years of trial and error. By understanding this process from limited hand-stopped horn playing to chromatically limitless valve horn, one might gain some curiosity as to how we might be able to improve the current forms of the instruments played in the modern orchestra, and perhaps cause a new sort of “evolution.”

Sources

Bernstein, “The Harmonic Series – Explained”

Fitzpatrick, Horace. “The Valveless Horn in Modern Performances of Eighteenth-CenturyMusic.” Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, vol. 91, 1964, pp. 45–60. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/765964.

Gregory, Robin. The Horn. Faber and Faber, 1961.

Gregory, Robin. “The Horn in Beethoven’s Symphonies.” Music & Letters, vol. 33, no. 4, 1952, pp. 303–310. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/729742.

Tuckwell, Barry. Horn. Schirmer Books, 1983.


From Nay to Yay: The Journey of the Meme-Worthy AirPods

Once upon a time, I vowed to never get AirPods. This week, I grabbed the last box off the shelf at the Apple store so I wouldn’t have to wait for the restock. I got AirPods, and it’s been “mildly life-changing” (as my friend described so accurately). 

Even saying that aloud to myself sounds absolutely dramatic, but it’s true. Gone are the days when I would do burpees with a phone in my hand at the gym. Gone are the days when I would blast my YouTube videos on my Alexa while blowdrying my hair. Gone are the days when I would have to lean ridiculously close to the iPhone speakers during a call with a friend (while multitasking, of course). I know it is only the end of January and I have only had them for three days, but this is hands-down my favorite purchase of 2019. 

My feelings summed up in a short iMessage exchange

AirPods were introduced in Apple’s Keynote event in September 2016. With features like 24-hour battery life, its magnetic charger-case and clear playback quality, the company claims that AirPods are “magical headphones [that] use advanced technology to reinvent…providing a wireless audio experience not possible before”.  

The initial reactions to this release were less-than-ideal. Feeling underwhelmed and skeptical, a large group of people claimed that AirPods are ugly and would easily be lost without the cord. Memes began to emerge and quickly spread across social media platforms, making fun of their appearance and wireless feature. 

Despite overwhelming amounts of hilarious tweets and comments, they did not seem to stop AirPods’ performance on the market. After the AirPods officially dropped in December 2016, the sales were at an impressive 16 to 18 million in 2017 . Even though Apple’s annuals sales report has not been released yet, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo estimates that the company sold between 26 to 28 million pairs in the year of 2018. With an anticipated release for AirPods 2 this year, he further claims that sales would likely quintuple over the next couple years. That is absolutely insane. 

With the AirPod’s stellar performance, it’s hard to wrap my head around the fact that there was a time when AirPods weren’t part of popular culture, when people were afraid to look stupid walking down the street with them (hence the “Courage” tweet). 

However, given the company’s history, it is definitely not surprising how the reception for the AirPods went from nay to yay.  Apple has been known for revolutionizing the electronic industry when it rose to become the world’s first trillion dollar company with the iPod. With Apple’s fearless approach to technological advancement and design changes, it’s understandable why something as different as AirPods would be negatively received at first. I was surprised to learn its history traced way back in 2011, when former Apple Designer Jorge S Fino filed a patent for earphones that could work with or without wires. How was he able to predict that such a feature would have such roaring success?

Considering all the different success factors that the AirPods may have, being the product of a  trend-setting company perhaps plays a significant role. After all, Apple did manage to convert me into a huge advocate of these darn things. 

‘Pro Tools’ as a Film Scoring Technology

One early afternoon, Amber settles down at the library and opens up her email tab; the top thread reads “Reminder: Film Music Draft due tomorrow”. She immediately opens up Pro Tools (audio production software) and delved into her scoring session. As a student film composer, she has been working with audio production softwares such as Logic Pro and Pro Tools for a few years now, producing brilliant music; yet many film composers have been utilizing the audio technology without fully understanding its history and all the endeavors that have gone into creating and continuously perfecting these audio production softwares. When did musicians and engineers conceive of this idea? How did this technology come into existence? Why was this important to the development of the film scoring industry? Moreover, how did this invention influence the way film composers create music today?

Interestingly, film music (soundtrack) as we know today was primarily performed live at movie theatres up until the 1930s– the advent of music synchronization to celluloid made it possible for film music to be a part of the viewing experience without the live accompaniment of the instrument ensemble. Since then, composers such as Max Steiner and Alfred Newman have been finessing the narrative power of music by creating impressive scores. This process, though, has made the director-composer collaboration a bit cumbersome: the director would either have face-to-face discussions and live experiments with the composer in front of a piano, or fully entrust the composer with the task of creating effective music for his or her film.

Thanks to UC Berkeley graduates Evan Brooks and Peter Gotcher, Pro Tools was first launched in 1991 as an audio editing software. Pro Tools was indeed very much limited by computers’ hard drive capacity at the time. Therefore, as computers became more and more powerful, the audio editing software gained true advantage given that its multi-track system allowed more and more tracks to be edited at the same time.

However, without proper input, Pro Tools would only serve as an editing software; i.e, composers would still have to book an orchestra to play their music, and then transfer the recording into Pro Tools for the sake of editing. As a result, the advent of MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) and virtual instruments allowed composers to experiment with numerous options of sound textures and effects in real time by connecting the MIDI keyboard to their computer and pressing the keys to play the selected virtual instrument . What does this all mean? Well, it means that the process of film scoring has been improved in two significant ways:

  1. Directors no longer need to meet up with composers on a regular basis in order to discuss the progress of the music.
  2. Composers now have a choice to either render their music through the audio production softwares, or continue to record live musicians as composers did before.

Moreover, companies began to create expressive virtual instruments by programming customized features such as attack, vibrato, and frequency range in order to further imitate the sound of real instruments, granting composers the freedom to create a score with just the MIDI keyboard and an audio production software (such as Pro Tools) without the complications of recording a real orchestra.  

After she recorded herself playing the violin part on the MIDI keyboard through Pro Tools, Amber decided to add some expression to the MIDI output by fiddling with the vibrato settings. As she was using a MIDI knob to adjust the amount of vibrato that came out from the string section, a strange thought occurred to her, and she wondered: “What would have happened if Wagner had Pro Tools to play with?”