We Insist!: Max Roach’s Bold Call for Freedom

“A revolution is unfurling-America’s unfinished revolution. It is unfurling in lunch counters, buses, libraries and schools-wherever the dignity and potential of men are denied. Youth and idealism are unfurling. Masses of Negroes are marching onto the stage of history and demanding their freedom now!” These fiery words from Civil Rights leader John Philip Randolph capture the call to revolution in the 1950s and 60s. The United States were in upheaval as Black Americans fought for equality in a nation which claims that “All men are created equal.” Around the nation, freedom fighters were participating in sit-ins, boycotts, and other forms of protest. In 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat, in 1957, the Little Rock Nine braved the harassment of their school, and in 1960, Max Roach recorded an album that would prove to be a jazz anthem the revolution happening all around him.

John Phillip Randolph, the Civil Rights Leader who’s words appear in the “Freedom Now!” liner notes (biography.com)

Max Roach was a virtuoso jazz drummer, a legend to this day. But the jazz stars of the 1950s and 1960s were not excluded from the harsh reality of racism and segregation. The copyright system was set up so that songwriters and producers gained the biggest checks. This left performers with little compensation for their talents. The American Federation of Musicians (AFM), which controlled access to the biggest gigs and venues, had been segregated since it’s founding. The AFM also controlled radio contracts, and made sure that white bands were favored in local and national broadcasts. In fact, it wasn’t until 1946 that Nat King Cole broke the prime time radio color barrier. Jazz musicians of the caliber of Sarah Vaughn and Cab Calloway were beaten by police and civilians alike. So although jazz musicians received some measure of status, they understood and experienced racism and segregation just like the rest of the black population.

The Album Cover to “We Insist!” depicts a sit-in, with three black men sitting at a what is most likely a white bar

It was into this scene that Max Roach inserted his musical call for freedom, the legendary album, “We Insist! The Freedom Now Suite!” The album had been politically motivated from the beginning. The liner notes suggest that the NAACP had hired Roach and vocalist Oscar Brown Jr. to write a piece for the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, which would occur in 1963. Although the Brown/Roach collaboration would be ended due to differing political views, the theme of freedom remained. Roach was joined by Vocalist Abbey Lincoln (who would be his wife from 1962-1970) and a star-studded cast of instrumentalists such as Booker Little (trumpet) and Julian Priester (trombone). The album captures Roach’s transition to the be-bop jazz-club scene to the harsher, grittier avant-garde style of the 1960s. This transition suits the harsh subject matter extremely well and provides a powerful picture of his world. The liner notes begin with the revolutionary quote from John Phillip Randolph. Roach and company were intentional about getting their message across. They wanted freedom, and they wanted it now.

The Album is composed as a chronological history of black culture in the US. “Driva Man” is a reference to pre-civil war slavery; “Freedom Day” recalls the excitement, anticipation and tension of Emancipation Day; “Triptych: Prayer, Protest, Peace” paints a vivid picture of the troubles blacks experienced in both the US and Africa; “All Africa” is a celebration of African culture; and “Tears for Johanassburg” is a response to the Sharpeville Massacre in South Africa.

A live version of “Freedom Day” performed in 1964. In this version, Roach plays a powerful solo near the beginning of the tune.

The performances on the album are all noteworthy, showcasing extreme virtuosity and expression. Particularly, “Freedom Day”, the most arranged tune on the album, stands out. Although the melody is simple, the tempo is absolute breakneck. Roach manages to keep up with this extreme tempo throughout, and provides a beautifully motivic and powerful solo near the end of the song. He begins simply, and then builds these simple motives to a thundering conclusion. Equally impressive is Little’s trumpet solo. Despite the extreme tempo, Little provides a fiery solo that is motivically sound and technically impressive. The tutti sections before and after the solo sections is particularly effective thanks to the powerful bass pedals that change shift under the dense chords of the horns. The lyrics, sung hauntingly by Lincoln, show an absolute disbelief that freedom day has come. This can be seen as powerful commentary of current events in the 50s and 60s. Although the Emancipation Proclamation provided some measure of freedom, true freedom still evaded black Americans. Roach himself stated that “we don’t really understand what it really is to be free. The last song we did, “Freedom Day” ended with a question mark.” This explains the mournful quality in a tune which subject matter would suggest jubilation.

The original Album version of Freedom Day
Max Roach and Abbey Lincoln

Indeed, “We Insist!” provided a turning point for Roach. After it’s release, he told Downbeat that “I will never again play anything that does not have social significance. We American jazz musicians of African descent have proved beyond all doubt that we’re master musicians of our instruments. Now what we have to do is employ our skill to tell the dramatic story of our people and what we’ve been through.” Roach’s call for freedom has not gone unheard. Although it was not well received, a tendency of avant-garde music, time has treated it well. The Guardian hailed it as a “landmark jazz album”  and Penguin Guide to Jazz gave the album a rare crown accolade. To this day, his message applies as the United States still seeks to sift through generations of racism and abuse. Perhaps we can think of “We Insist!” as Max Roach’s version of kneeling during the national anthem, championed infamously by Colin Kaepernick. Similar to Kaepernick, Roach used his status to make a bold and obvious political statement. Both Kaepernick and Roach were not well received at first, but both succeeded in getting their point across, whether or not the public was ready. Roach believed that music was political, and did not hesitate to use his talents for his cause. And sathough it is close to its 60th birthday, “We Insist!” still relates to current events and can still inspire and inform a new generation of jazz lovers and Americans.

More live music from Freedom Now Suite

Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess: Breaking the Mold Or Reminder of Old?

Although President Trump’s statement, “We write symphonies,” was not perfect, he made a good decision to point towards music while praising the progressive mentality adopted by the U.S. and its allies.  There’s no doubt the President’s three-worded, blanket statement insinuates that classical music is an elitist artform, but Polish and American composers have produced countless works of art which aim to expose the exploitation of and prejudice against specific groups of people. George Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess is an example of music creating awareness and helping those in need.  

The initial reception of Porgy and Bess after its release in 1935 was mixed at best.  Both the casting and the music were called into question as Gershwin’s folk opera featured an all-black cast as well as music that combined elements of jazz with western classical music.  Gershwin was faced with the challenging task of writing music that would pass as authentic folk music but would also withstand the highbrow scrutiny of operatic audiences. Duke Ellington said Gershwin’s score did not reflect a genuine “Negro musical idiom,” but other critics said, “It abounds in color, it retains the quality of the Negro chant, the spiritual, the wail, the jazz, and the blues.” Not only was the music a hit or miss for some folks, but the content of Gershwin’s folk opera also had some questionable implications. Some described Porgy and Bess as a detriment to the race and as a vehicle that promoted racist stereotypes.

Even though Gershwin depicted Bess as a substance abuser with a penchant for abusive men and Porgy as a crippled beggar, Gershwin was still shining the spotlight on African American performers in 1935.  Empowering these actors and actresses on stage gave them opportunities to bring about real change. During the show’s run in Washington D.C., the cast went on strike to protest the National Theatre’s segregation policy.  Todd Duncan, starring as Porgy, was successful in organizing the protest and as a result ushered in the first integrated audience at the National Theatre on March 21, 1936.

Gershwin’s creation was celebrated by a host of incredibly influential musicians.  In 1958, trumpeter Louis Armstrong collaborated with Ella Fitzgerald to release an entire album of Gershwin’s music and one year after that Miles Davis released a similar album featuring the writing of Gil Evans.  The two albums are based off of the same material, but the end results are entirely different. Showcasing modal improvisation and third stream aesthetics, the Miles Davis record was quite innovative at the time of its release, whereas the 1958 record is another chronicle in the legacy of the iconic trumpet-vocal duo.

Inspiring two landmark albums, creating change in significant institutions, and advocating for African Americans in the arts, Porgy and Bess remains to be one of the most important American operas today. Gershwin innovated his art to incorporate elements from other cultures to create a dramatic documentation of American life.  I say dramatic because the production is hardly factual and uses Gershwin’s ideas of African American culture as an outlet for expression. His folktale created opportunities for Black Americans to perform on legitimate stage bringing about discussion and change.  I generally have a hard time supporting anything President Trump says, but a nod to Western Culture’s music history while making an appeal to America’s innovative spirit, “We write symphonies. We pursue innovation,” is one of the less ridiculous statements he’s made especially with figures like Miles Davis, George Gershwin, Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong decorating our history.

Strange Fruit: A Declaration of War

It was a March night in 1939 New York City. You and a group of friends decide to go out to Cafe Society, a new night club in the former speakeasy on West 4th Street. Billie Holiday, the 23 year old up-and-coming black jazz singer, is performing. She in all her melanin splendor with a single gardenia adorned on her hair, is standing on the stage of the L shaped hall, about to perform her last piece. The lights dim to darkness and a single spotlight illuminates her golden face as she begins to sing:

Southern trees bear strange fruit,
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root,
Black bodies swinging in the southern breeze,
Strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees.

Whispers quickly spread amongst the audience.”Lynching? Is this song about lynching?” someone says. The song continues and the chatter quickly dies out as every single ear and eye is on Holiday. The room is still, the air frozen.

Pastoral scene of the gallant south,
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth,
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh,
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh.

Here is fruit for the crows to pluck,
For the rain to gather, for the wind to suck,
For the sun to rot, for the trees to drop,
Here is a strange and bitter crop.

After the last word, the room snaps to black. When the lights are brought back up, Holiday is gone. No one moves. Do you applaud for the “courage and intensity of the performance, stunned by the grisly poetry of the lyrics, sensing history moving through the room? Or do you shift awkwardly in your seat, shudder at the strange vibrations in the air, and think to yourself: call this entertainment?”

This is “Strange Fruit.” Although not written by Billie Holiday, her deeply personal and visceral vocal performance ultimately made the song an instant anthem for anti-lynching during the Civil Rights movement . The song began as just a poem written by Jewish communist Abel Meeropol, when he was inspired by this photo of a double lynching. Meerpool later composed the melody. Even though lynching was in decline at the time of piece’s composition, the image of a black person being lynched in the American south acted as a universal and incredibly vivid symbol of American racism as a whole during the Civil Rights movement, making this piece truly one of protest.

“‘Strange Fruit’ was not by any means the first protest song,” writes Dorian Lynskey for The Guardian, “but it was the first to shoulder an explicit political message into the arena of entertainment. Unlike the robust workers’ anthems of the union movement, it did not stir the blood; it chilled it.” Never before had a piece of music so explicitly called out the injustices in America by name, which is part of the reason why Holiday’s primary recording company, Columbia, refused to record the song. Holiday eventually had the piece recorded by Commodore Records, and within its first year was added to Library of Congress’ National Recording Registry.

Emmett Till (1941-1955)

Holiday’s piece had struck a nerve among the American people, and sent a surge forward in the progress of the Civil Rights movement. Atlantic Records founder Ahmet Ertegun called the song “a declaration of war… the beginning of the civil rights movement”. Which couldn’t be more fitting. This piece began a wave of publicizing lynchings; bringing them out of the shadows of their perpetrators and into the light–forcing the American people to face the injustice happening in their own backyards. “Strange Fruit” paved the way for future lynchings to be more publicized as a result. Take, for example, the lynching of Emmett Till in 1955 Mississippi, who at the age of 14 was lynched after being accused of offending a white women. Emmett’s body, disfigured beyond recognition when it was discovered, was displayed in an open casket funeral for all to see, so everyone will know the horrors and the aftermath of racist acts of violence.

At its core, “Strange Fruit” is a song about injustice: a call to action to stop the lynchings and racist acts of violence. A call that is still incredibly necessary today, in the age of Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, Oscar Grant, Sean Bell, and so many others. A call that has been answered boldly by the actions of some, notably San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick who refused to stand during the national anthem stating n an interview with NFL Media., “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color…To me, this is bigger than football, and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

The injustices against our black brothers and sisters, both in the murder of innocent lives and in the subtle microaggressions experienced daily by black people now in this country, can no longer be ignored a pushed aside. Which makes the message of “Strange Fruit,” as an anthem against racism of all forms, all the more relevant today. Just as the way it inspired people during the Civil Rights movement to shed light on the injustices, it inspires people in the today century to do the same. It also begs the question about the longevity of the Civil Rights movement: Did it ever really end or was it just pushed out of the forefront of the social stage to lie dormant until people were once again unable to ignore the injustices happening around them?

And what of Billie, whose voice and soul sparked a movement? Her impact as a performing artist, who seemed to sing with an “immaculate sadness,” still lives on today, even after her death. The music of Billie Holiday and the impact she had on the Civil Rights movement and their lasting effects on so many people today is undeniable. Her act of “war” really was in some ways, a bringing forth of light to show the world that racism in America was no longer something that could be covered up or hidden. Above all else, “Strange Fruit” calls for a willingness to endure–to endure through a world filled with hate until the message embedded in this song is no longer needed.

“Behind me, Billie was on her last song. I picked up the refrain, humming a few bars. Her voice sounded different to me now. Beneath the layers of hurt, beneath the ragged laughter, I heard a willingness to endure. Endure—and make music that wasn’t there before.”

Barack Obama in Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (2007), p. 112

“The Future is Female”

In 2016, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kapernick sparked a national uproar when he chose to kneel rather than stand during the playing of the national anthem. In an interview with NFL media he said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color… To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

Kapernick’s critique of his country did not go unnoticed by the president, who took to twitter to complain:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1027892043908046849?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

As Trump seems to suggest, Kapernick is a football player. Shouldn’t he just stick to that and stay out of politics? Is Kapernick letting down his fans by using his professional position to advocate for a political position? Or is this type of activism an effective and necessary means for change? People in all professions face these questions. These questions are especially on the minds of female jazz musicians today. Jazz has traditionally existed as a male-dominated field, aside from African American female vocalists. The deeply embedded “jazz patriarchy” still exists, but more and more women are breaking into the field and establishing themselves. Some of these women, though affected by the gender politics of jazz and America in general, do not find their inspiration in politics. They take the stance that gender does not exist in music; that worrying about gender politics only distracts from their musical endeavors. Others are inspired by their experiences in the face of sexism, and choose to use their music as a force for change. Roxy Coss is an example of one of these women.

https://www.roxycoss.com/gallery

In 2018, Roxy Coss released the album “The Future is Female.” Right off the bat, you can tell from the title that this album holds a political message: that women will change the world. The photo on the cover shows Roxy standing confidently and defiantly. To me, this image presents Roxy as an example of a young woman taking on the world, challenging anything that might get in her way, and inspiring other women to do the same.

https://www.amazon.com/Future-Female-Roxy-Coss/dp/B079VD5SVF/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=the+future+is+female+Roxy+coss&qid=1554086712&s=gateway&sr=8-1

The track titles, listed below, provide even more insight to the purpose of Roxy’s work and its relationship to the current political climate.

https://www.amazon.com/Future-Female-Roxy-Coss/dp/B079VD5SVF/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=the+future+is+female+Roxy+coss&qid=1554086712&s=gateway&sr=8-1

“Nevertheless, She Persisted” “Draws its title from words uttered by Senator Mitch McConnell during the process to silence Senator Elizabeth Warren from raising objection to the confirmation of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General.” Other titles address the president, such as “Nasty Women Grab Back,” which responds to Donald Trump’s infamous comment which doesn’t need to be repeated here. “Me Too” is obviously a contribution to the #metoo movement. One title that stood out to me as a young female jazz musician was “She Needed a Hero, so That’s What She Became.” I interpret this title as referring to the lack of female role models in jazz and beyond. Roxy is suggesting here that in the absence of role models, she realized she would have to fill that void so that young women in generations to come would have somebody to look up to and be inspired by.

Aside from the track titles and cover art, the nature of the songs themselves seem to suggest a certain political urgency. Reviews for the album point this out. One Downbeat review reads, “The Future Is Female is all instrumental, but it’s message music through and through… This is hard-hitting post-bop: aggressive, determined and grim.” Another review from allaboutjazz.com says about the song “She Needed a Hero, so That’s What She Became,” “A sense of tension can be felt, a spirit drowning in solitude seeking absolution.” Thus, Roxy’s work has clearly blended music and politics into one. She is not just a musician speaking about politics, her music almost speaks for itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYC9tMS6W2M

In an interview with popmatters.com, Roxy says, “Every single woman I’ve ever talked to in this industry has many stories that are horrible. People need to hear the stories, but the bigger idea is: This is going on, it is rampant, and we have to fix it, deal with it, and do something positive.” Aside from her album, another project Roxy has created to combat issues of discrimination is the founding of the Women in Jazz Organization, or WIJO. This organization strives “To improve issues in the Jazz community: how people in Jazz see and treat us; how people outside the Jazz community see and treat us; and how we see and treat ourselves and each other.”

Again, as a female jazz musician myself, Roxy’s album had a huge impact on me. I was inspired by her musicianship and the message of her music. I was thankful that Roxy blatantly called out political issues and addressed them, rather than disguising her message. Roxy’s album undoubtedly inspires other young women and therefore positively impacts society. Her work proves that music and politics belong together, and that music with a political message can change the world.

  • https://www.allaboutjazz.com/the-future-is-female-roxy-coss-posi-tone-records-review-by-paul-rauch.php
  • https://www.popmatters.com/roxy-coss-interview-2556338405.html
  • http://wearewijo.org/about/about-us/
  • https://www.roxycoss.com/about
  • https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/colin-kaepernick-and-the-radical-uses-of-the-star-spangled-banner
  • http://downbeat.com/reviews/detail/the-future-is-female

Some things will never change

Bruce Hornsby performing live

This message is embodied in Bruce Hornsby’s The Way It Is released in 1986. The song went triple platinum and went straight to the top of the Billboard 100. It’s personally one of my favorite songs ever because of how catchy it is, but the lyrics brings a new listening experience. It reveals the realities of racism and poverty in America as a political response to the existing conservative government. The message in the lyrics is implying that it is time to take action in order to achieve racial equality, or will things never change? This song was meant to create a palatable melody in order to smoothly deliver a painful message to the American audience. You cannot pull apart this song or find the true intention of this artist by just enjoying the music aspects. This song was written to say that America is not equal in race now, it was not in 1986 and not any time before then either. The music is not meant to be used just for the sake of saying it sounds great, but it is meant to convey a meaning.

The jazz influenced melody/tune has a very relaxing, almost sentimental mood. There is a catchy piano vamp that is repeated in the song, but the lyrics represent a melancholy protest against the political landscape of the 1980’s. Specifically, Bruce Hornsby wrote this piece about the Reagan administration. He was directly targeting the Republican party and accusing them of neglecting the Civil Right Act that was passed in 1964 allowing for equal opportunity and treatment of black Americans. Amazingly, not much has changed today with continued protests about everything from racial profiling, movements such as Black Lives Matter, police brutality against blacks, and disproportionate percentages of young black men being incarcerated for non-violent offenses.

Starting in 2001, Sean Hannity, a conservative radio host, decided to use The Way It Is instrumental version for his theme song. He longer believed that the lyrics were important to the song, and did not want to include them. Hornsby was a liberal democrat and did not like that this was happening; however, he could not do anything about it since he was still receiving royalties. However, it wasn’t about receiving the royalties that mattered, it was that the song was being misused. The song taken without the lyrics is selling it short of its’ intention. This shows the difference of how receptive the audience is for this song. With the focus on just the melodies, the true intention of this song is blurred. The real intention lies behind the larger social implications coming from the lyrics.

Standing in line, marking time
Waiting for the welfare dime
‘Cause they can’t buy a job
The man in the silk suit hurries by
As he catches the poor old lady’s eyes
Just for fun he says, “Get a job.”

The first verse talks about how there were a growing amount of people cashing out on welfare, waiting in a long line just to catch a spare dime. It calls out the government for not taking the initiative to help people in poverty, and instead ignoring them ruthlessly as useless individuals while the government pockets and spends all their wealth. This also reflects the very high and increasing poverty rate in 1986 (14.6%). The message still rings true today with Trump taking massive cuts to Medicare, Medicade, and Social Security. For years, conservatives were completely against cash handouts to “undeserving” poor people. They believed welfare made people “lazy”. They refused to believe that there were any other benefits to having it unless it was food stamps, since those could only be exchanged for food.

Said hey, little boy, you can’t go where the others go
‘Cause you don’t look like they do
Said hey, old man, how can you stand to think that way?
Did you really think about it before you made the rules?
He said, son

The second verse is pointing out the racism in the attitudes of white people towards black people. Bruce Hornsby’s questions these attitudes from the old white man, asking why people have to think this way? Are people never going to change their minds no matter what rules they make? This type of public perception/attitude that white people have of black people still exists in the United States. I have witnessed it happen to my friends as well as many others. Social movements and protests against this perception that I mentioned earlier are very prevalent as well in today’s social-political landscape.

Well, they passed a law in ’64
To give those who ain’t got a little more
But it only goes so far
Because the law don’t change another’s mind
When all it sees at the hiring time
Is the line on the color bar, no

The last verse talks about the Civil Rights Act in 1964. However, it has not done much to change the way people behave or think about it. Even though the laws have passed, there was still a lot of employment discrimination and racist behavior. White unemployment in 1986 was 6% nationwide while black unemployment was more than twice as much at 14.1%. The differences can still be seen today (2018) with black unemployment (6.3%) at least twice as high as white unemployment (3.2%) on the national level. The highest point of white unemployment is in West Virginia at 5%, not even surpassing the national average of black unemployment.

That’s just the way it is
Some things will never change

The ending chorus statement is what makes this song powerful. It also posses the question of would it be possible for things to change for the better? It takes all the statements that were made and sums them up as a seemingly disappointing status quo. In 2019, it still seems like these racial issues are still just the way it is for some Americans. The lyrics seemed to be very present in the Trayvon Martin case and the acquittal of George Zimmerman. The song was also re-adapted by others reaffirming the same political message, one example would be Tupac’s hip-hop song Changes (1998):

The music has acted as a medium for this important political statement to be made across a large audience. The music was used as a way to increase awareness of issues and to challenge the unfair normalities of society. The music does can’t always focus on the “greatness” of how it sounds, because sometimes the deeper meaning is what gives music that power. The lyrics have really stood the test of time, and they continue ring just as much truth now as they also did in 1986.

Sources:

https://pilotonline.com/entertainment/music/article_a6cc6911-3840-5dde-94c8-f67f2a5441e3.html

https://world.wng.org/2009/09/bruce_goes_berserk

https://www.laweekly.com/music/bruce-hornsby-on-tupac-the-original-changes-was-a-lot-dirtier-had-a-lot-of-the-n-word-2410784

https://www.songfacts.com/facts/bruce-hornsby-the-range/the-way-it-is

https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1987/02/art1full.pdf

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/06/donald-trump-snap-tanf-welfare-reorganization

https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/brucehornsby/thewayitis.html

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2600/1*CqIo31XeftQhS_KC2bfOzQ.jpeg

1968 National Anthem

The American National Anthem is one song that all Americans can come together dismiss conflicts or political differences, and sing as one community. Certain topics like religion, race, or culture, have caused tension between one another and created this boundary between people. The National Anthem is a powerful statement that can erase those tensions. However in certain cases like Jose Feliciano’s 1968 performance of the National Anthem or Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the anthem, these events caused a political outbreak whether it was intentionally or taken the complete opposite way.

The “Star-Spangled Banner” is played before every American sporting event whether it be football, basketball, or baseball and is usually performed by a well known artist. Jimi Hendrix, Harry Connick Jr, or Jennifer Hudson are a few of the many famous artists that have sang the National Anthem.

Image result for whitney houston national anthem
https://steemit.com/music/@slipperyslope48/whitney-houston-sings-national-anthem-star-spangled-banner-super-bowl-xxv-in-1991-tampa

In today’s era of National Anthems, originality and displaying one’s artistry is a key factor. Artists like Whitney Houston in Super Bowl XXV in 1991 or even this year’s performance of Gladys Knight Knight in Super Bowl LIII, sang more than just the anthem. They created a musical performance out of it. However originality does take a hit like when Fergie sang her rendition during the 2018 NBA All Star week. Some say it is the worst performance in recent history but she stuck to her sound or voice throughout the performance. Listening to all three versions shows the uniqueness in all their performances and speaks to who they are as artists.

Back in October 7, 1968, Jose Feliciano, a 23 year old, upcoming artist from Puerto Rico, sang his rendition of the National Anthem. Back in those days, the national anthem was sung pretty straight forward. They kept to the tradition and did not really branch out too much whether it be harmonically or form wise. However, that all changed when Jose Feliciano became one of the first artist to put his own twist on it.

Image result for jose feliciano 1968
https://www.news-press.com/story/entertainment/2018/10/05/jose-feliciano-paid-price-when-he-sang-national-anthem-1968/1514370002/

Feliciano sang it in a Latin, jazz twist. He reharmonized the song making it sound very different compared to the traditional sound. It still hints the main key centers such as the secondary dominance going to the V chord, but overall the song really speaks to who he is as an artist. He had this laidback, acoustic sound to him which was what got him his first success of singing The Doors’s “Light My Fire”. Feliciano turned this national anthem into a song that represented himself. As great as it sounds in today’s ear, in 1968, the audience had a much different view.

The audience responded with boo’s and cheers. Some said “It was a disgrace, an insult. I’m going to write my senator about it”, or “It sounded like a hippie was singing it”. In a way, these quotes make sense. 1968 was a tense time since the Vietnam war was going on and protests against the war were still going on. People who saw Feliciano for the first time saw this guy with long hair, sunglasses and a dog beside him. At first glance, it does imply that this artist is with the protesters, but the the sunglasses and dog are actually because he is blind. Once his performance was over, many of the listeners truly believed it became a political stunt rather than an artist singing an original version.

If that were true, that would be a huge statement on society. This was an immigrant singing his interpretation of the American National at a major sporting event. His look and musical voice represented a one side of the political sides at the time. People thought it was unpatriotic. However, that was not Feliciano’s view on it. Feliciano was shocked and taken back on the criticized he received. He hoped to convey the complete opposite. On Flag day at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, Feliciano talks about what he hoped to convey to the immigrants in American or new citizens. He says “what it’s like for me to be an American, and they’re in for a treat. If they work hard, they’ll have no regrets. I have no regrets, though I was the first artist to stylize the national anthem, and I got a lot of protests for it. I have no regrets. America has been good to me. I’m glad that I’m here.”

Though many people condemned this performance, there were some supporters in his rendition. Tim McCarver, catcher for the Cardinals, said “Why not that way? People go through a routine when they play the anthem. They stand up and yawn and almost fall asleep. This way, at least they listened.” Bill Freehan of the Tigers said “I know one thing. He made Marvin Gaye, who sang the anthem Sunday, sound like a square.” This rendition became an inspiration for other versions. Many artists today, put their own spin on the anthem.

This relates to The New Yorker article “Colin Kaepernick and the Radical uses of ‘Star-Spangled Banner’”. Here is an influential figure in both sports and society actively voicing his opinion. Colin Kaepernick refused to stand while the “Star-Spangled Banner” was played before a preseason game. He states “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color”.

Image result for colin kaepernick knee
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/colin-kaepernick-football-protests.html

These two topics both have the deal in politics however, Kaepernick intentionally created a stance while Feliciano did not. It shows how powerful and influential this figures have on American society and culture. The fact that both these topics influenced many and became a national topic just shows the impact they have. In the end, they both stuck to who they are as people and believed that their actions would represent themselves.

Sources

  • https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/sports/baseball/national-anthem.html
  • https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2017/11/02/560948130/a-different-national-anthem-before-the-nation-was-ready-for-it
  • https://www.mlb.com/cut4/jose-feliciano-national-anthem-was-50-years-ago-c296904880
  • https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/for-50-years-jose-felicianos-soulful-take-national-anthem-given-pride-immigrant-pride-180969380/
  • http://josefeliciano.com/wp/biography/
  • https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/colin-kaepernick-and-the-radical-uses-of-the-star-spangled-banner
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1ZQawbo4Mo
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_lCmBvYMRs
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTuoq6TllaU
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMA2iF6RuXk
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RtTWDv-yWM

Neck Straps Today: Gimmicks or Essentials

All saxophonists and other musicians who play larger woodwinds invest in some piece of technology to support their instruments while they play them. Most people call this piece of technology a neck strap, but as manufacturers become increasingly aware of occupational hazards, some of these devices have absolutely zero contact with the players neck. For instance, JAZZLAB makes a harness which is made of high-tech, lightweight materials, and can be adjusted seven different ways to Sunday.

Now don’t get me wrong, JAZZLAB makes a great product and I have seen many players use this piece of equipment on several occasions, but I have always wondered if their product actually improves posture. If I’m at all like some of my fellow instrumentalists, I don’t think about my posture nearly enough whenever I pick up my horn. But when I do, I think about my posture from the ground up and try sit or stand as naturally as possible as if the horn weren’t even in my hands. The Saxophone Guy provides an excellent breakdown on building a healthy, supportive playing position and also has some pretty sweet pictures on his site:

https://www.saxophone-guy.com/good-posture.html

The Saxophone Guy has some pretty killing posture, but where is his JAZZLAB saXholder!? Countless saxophone legends have been able to play the instrument at the highest of levels without the aid of special harnesses. Here is some photo-graphical evidence for your viewing pleasure:

In the photographs above, we have three jazz giants and zero saxophone suspension gadgets. Perhaps I am a traditionalist, but the previous fact is a good indication that saxophonists today don’t need a fancy harnesses to facilitate good posture and achieve mastery of the instrument.

While Michael Brecker, John Coltrane, and Dexter Gordon were truly masters of their craft, let’s take a closer look at a different saxophonist: Rich Perry (linked below).h

http://richperrymusic.com/

Rich Perry visited the Eastman School of Music in 2016 and performed as a guest with the Eastman Jazz Lab Band in addition to teaching a few master classes. When he played, he used the JAZZLAB saXholder to support his saxophone. I remember him saying that his harness was an essential step in his recovery. After years of developing bad posture, Rich created not only a unique sound on the tenor but also chronic pain in his neck and shoulders. He corrected this issue by improving his posture and using a harness instead of the old-fashioned neck straps. And if you don’t believe me, here’s a video of him playing with his harness on (solo starts at 5:00).

Rich Perry is one of many who has experienced the therapeutic benefits of playing with a harness. To invest approximately $50 to increase the longevity of your musical career is perfectly reasonable decision to make. But if you don’t have to, and you buy an expensive harness to have the latest technology I would advise against it. Either way, it’s probably better than playing on one of these!

https://secondhandsaxes.com.au/images/wrecksspares/brilhart%20sop%20strap.jpg

EWI: The musical instrument of the future

The EWI, otherwise known as an electronic wind instrument, is a technological invention that has made a huge impact on many different genres of music and has a recent history that is often overlooked.

The History of the Instrument:

It all started in 1981, with inventor Nyle Steiner. In its first stages, the EWI was made by hand, and was essentially an analog controller that didn’t have very many sounds other than the ones built in. The top of the EWI contains sensors inside the mouthpiece that measures how much wind is being blown into the instrument and would change the volume. The front of the instrument was made of non-movable buttons/parts on the front. On the back close to the mouthpiece, there is a series of metal rollers that would allow the user to control the octave register with their thumb.

The front of the EWI
The back of the EWI

Shortly after being created, its increasing popularity caused some of the users to carry lots of extra equipment in order to create extra sounds as well as cords that made the it compatible with other synthesizers. The solution to that problem came when Steiner integrated the MIDI box into the EWI in 1985. This allowed the it to be more compatible with commonly used samplers and mimicked any real sound the user wanted to make. That is why the instrument itself was so versatile, including it’s ability to program different fingerings (for brass instruments or saxophone) that are more familiar to users.

Once Steiner was no longer able to make the EWI’s by hand, he went to Akai Professional who were already working on their own digital sampler at the time with music instrument company Electroharmonix, and made a deal for the prototype to be mass produced. It continued to be revised over the years to improve its technological abilities and playing ability. The most recent model, the Akai EWI 5000 was revealed in 2014, and even contains its own soundboard to change reverb, delay, chorus, and pitches. It features the same button/octave mechanics as the original but in a much slimmer form containing more advanced technology, and more patch sounds.

The Akai EWI 5000 model

The EWI and Michael Brecker:

The most prominent figure in the early advancement of the EWI was virtuoso jazz/fusion saxophonist, Michael Brecker. He used the it as a platform to expand the range of sounds possible on a MIDI controller, as well as a tool for improvisation in a jazz/fusion related context. He even used it as a solo unaccompanied instrument in some contexts, looping certain sections as well as harmonize itself to create sounds representing an entire ensemble. Considering the more common pop/dance/jazz fusion sounds that existed in the 1980’s, I would consider the EWI groundbreaking in terms of surpassing what people thought was musically possible.

The first major breakthrough for the EWI occurred when Michael Brecker performed Steps Ahead in Tokyo in 1986, only five years after the it was invented. It features the EWI’s full technological capability with the help of extraneous pedals/synthesizers/foot switches to create a plethora of futuristic sounds. All the way up until 3:33, it is just Michael Brecker alone venturing into fascinating harmonic depths.

Another example would include my favorite piece featuring the EWI: Original Rays on Michael Brecker’s Michael Brecker (1987). It is also plugged into an Oberheim Xpander (a six voice keyless interval generator/analog synthesizer). The notes that are being played on the EWI are marked as pink, and the color coated chunks mark each time the Oberheim Xpander generates a new set of six intervals harmonizing the main note.

One last example, just because Michael Brecker is that awesome, is the song Itsbynne Reel on Don’t Try this at Home (1988). It showcases the EWI in a different context as described in the liner notes by George Varga: “The opening section, ‘Itsbynne Reel’ begins with a vigorous traditional Irish-reel-cum bluegrass duet between Brecker on EWI and violinist O’Connor before leading into a driving, harmonized vamp…” It’s not the typical setting for an electronic instrument with violin, but it totally works and that is the best part. The EWI is not just limited to jazz or fusion music, it can go anywhere if it fits the context. I also highly recommend listening to the rest of the track, it’s quite unbelievable.

EWI in the context of contemporary music:
Although the EWI became more popular among other users, more artists became critical over its legitimacy in music after Michael Brecker didn’t use the it as often in the 1990’s. Despite that, there are a lot of musicians that continued to use it at a very high level, one of them being Bob Mintzer. There is a group called the Yellowjackets that features him on the saxophone and on a more recent model of the instrument. One of my favorite snippets of the group is them performing in Stockholm in 2009, showcasing the amount of technical ability that can be achieved while being musical and assimilating vocabulary from the blues/jazz.

EWI as its own instrument:

As awesome as the EWI can sound, people often mistake it as being too similar to being able to play an acoustic instrument, specifically the saxophone, clarinet and flute. As described in an article regarding technique and expressivity on EWI, the reason why the it is incredible is because it requires its own technical mastery, completely separate from any other instrument. That is why people often experiment with the EWI, but do not get past the early stages. One major difference is that the buttons are touch sensitive, as opposed to physical finger buttons that can be pressed down or tone holes that can be covered as well. It is essential that the finger movement is clean and precise. If users are not paying attention, their fingers can be easily touching buttons and swirling between notes that were not intended. Another challenging concept is the touch sensitive thumb roller for the octave register. It is not the same as producing the upper and lower harmonics on an acoustic instrument. If users aren’t careful, the thumb can easily roll quickly between octaves and creates a huge whirlpool of morphed unintentional sounds. There are also seven/eight octaves on the instrument, which is a lot more than usual acoustical instruments are accustomed to having. Figuring out how to properly incorporate this huge range on the instrument into music can be very challenging as well. The continuing capabilities of the EWI include pitch bend, vibrato, and glissandos is not as easy to use in context as users might think. The mouthpiece is also made of hard rubber, which can feel much different than actively vibrating a reed or buzzing in a brass mouthpiece. As an EWI 5000 user myself, I absolutely love the instrument, but the technical challenges are certainly apparent.

EWI and its place in music today:

One issue that the EWI ran into at the beginning of its development is that it was considered as a replacement for 80’s jazz/pop saxophone. This limited the usage and its credibility to be continually used in other contexts. I believe that the EWI should be treated as its own instrument and should be assimilated into any musical context of which is appropriate. Considering that it is somewhat like a technological version of what an acoustic wind instrument, it is very unique and has a futuristic/contemporary feeling to it. It can certainly push the boundaries of what is possible in music and can also yield to the creation of other music niches/genres in the future.

Sources:

https://www.patchmanmusic.com/JoelPeskinEWIStory.html

The EWI

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/penny-will/the-amazing-ewi_b_1746317.html

http://www.gwhitty.com/ewi.html

https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=oa_dissertations

Varga, G. (1988). [Liner notes]. In Dont Try this at Home [Vinyl, LP]. New York: Impulse record label, MCA Records, Inc.

The Real Book

Useful or Useless?

Any jazz musician knows exactly what the Real Book is. They probably own one or two; stashed in a corner collecting dust. Here’s the story of why the Real Book was created, and why it is so essential and useless at the same time.

In the late 1940s, the first compilations of common popular repertoire for gigging musicians, called Fake Books, were created. These books were born from Tune-Dex cards, (pictured below), which offered a melody and a crude version of the chord changes to popular songs. The idea was that musicians could carry around these cards so that when they got a request they didn’t know, they could just find the index card and read the tune. 

https://blog.library.gsu.edu/2010/10/13/popular-music-tune-dex-cards/

However, carrying around an unorganized mess of 3×5 cards to every gig clearly was not convenient. So, bootleg books containing copies of Tune-Dex cards, organized in alphabetical order, began to circulate. The compilations were called “Fake Books” because they allowed musicians to “fake” their way through songs they didn’t know.

Around 1975, a group of unnamed students at the Berklee College of Music decided to create something like Fake Books, but more accurate and containing music that was relevant to jazz musicians. They probably wanted access to a collection of new charts by people like Chick Corea and Steve Swallow. So they went to work transcribing lead sheets for their favorite tunes and writing them out by hand in what became known as the Real Book. The book was an immediate success. 

It’s important to note that none of the artists whose tunes were included in the Real Book were paid for their work. Was this legal? Definitely not. The Berklee musicians apparently looked into legitimizing the Real Book, but realized doing so would be nearly impossible and extremely expensive. So, versions of the Real Book were sold illegally until 2003, when the Hal Leonard Corporation legitimized most of the charts from the original real book and sold a version that was actually legal. There are now several volumes, transposed versions, and bass clef versions of the Real Book. You can also buy the “Real Christmas Book,” or even the “Real Country Book”….

It’s hard to imagine anyone would complain about the Real Book. Any jazz musician should be thankful that somebody else already did the work of transcribing the chords and melody of the standard jazz repertoire, right? Plus, if you don’t know many tunes, you can show up to a jam session and just read from your handy Real Book. As great as this may sound, the fact is, if you show up to a jam with a Real Book at any point past high school, you will be immediately shunned and your quality of musicianship will probably be questioned. This reaction may just be the product of battling egos and “jazz boys” trying to prove that they know more than other “jazz boys.” However, widespread disrespect for the use of Real Books is a legitimate position to hold.

Aimee Nolte, a jazz educator whose youtube channel has over 100k followers, sums up a few of these reasons in the video below. She mentions that if you want to learn a song, it’s much more likely to stick if you learn it by ear instead of relying on the lead sheet. If you’re always faking it, you’re never really learning anything. Plus, books are heavy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMiCg8sDQh4

Furthermore, even in the newest versions of the Real Book, the chords are often wrong. For example, if you’re familiar with jazz harmony, try listening to Herbie Hancock’s Dolphin Dance and comparing the chords you hear to the chords on the lead sheet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB2Z2DY17yQ
http://www.guitarcats.com/realbook-jazz-standards/dolphin-dance

Close……

The Real Book has its down sides, but we must not forget the lasting and widespread impact it has had on jazz. It will always be a great reference to start with when learning a tune, and its a great backup when you’re on the spot. As an article in jazzadvice.com states, “the book is like a pair of training wheels for your improvising.” Just remember that at the end of the day it’s always better to learn a tune by ear.

Sources:

  • https://officialrealbook.com/history/
  • http://www.bassfrontiersmag.com/the-real-book-a-history-commentary
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD0e5e6wI_A
  • https://web.archive.org/web/20160403035705/http://www.personal.psu.edu/bdk4/PREHISTORY.pdf
  • https://www.jazzadvice.com/why-you-shouldnt-be-a-real-book-player/
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMiCg8sDQh4
  • https://blog.library.gsu.edu/2010/10/13/popular-music-tune-dex-cards/
  • http://www.guitarcats.com/realbook-jazz-standards/dolphin-dance