1968 National Anthem

The American National Anthem is one song that all Americans can come together dismiss conflicts or political differences, and sing as one community. Certain topics like religion, race, or culture, have caused tension between one another and created this boundary between people. The National Anthem is a powerful statement that can erase those tensions. However in certain cases like Jose Feliciano’s 1968 performance of the National Anthem or Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the anthem, these events caused a political outbreak whether it was intentionally or taken the complete opposite way.

The “Star-Spangled Banner” is played before every American sporting event whether it be football, basketball, or baseball and is usually performed by a well known artist. Jimi Hendrix, Harry Connick Jr, or Jennifer Hudson are a few of the many famous artists that have sang the National Anthem.

Image result for whitney houston national anthem
https://steemit.com/music/@slipperyslope48/whitney-houston-sings-national-anthem-star-spangled-banner-super-bowl-xxv-in-1991-tampa

In today’s era of National Anthems, originality and displaying one’s artistry is a key factor. Artists like Whitney Houston in Super Bowl XXV in 1991 or even this year’s performance of Gladys Knight Knight in Super Bowl LIII, sang more than just the anthem. They created a musical performance out of it. However originality does take a hit like when Fergie sang her rendition during the 2018 NBA All Star week. Some say it is the worst performance in recent history but she stuck to her sound or voice throughout the performance. Listening to all three versions shows the uniqueness in all their performances and speaks to who they are as artists.

Back in October 7, 1968, Jose Feliciano, a 23 year old, upcoming artist from Puerto Rico, sang his rendition of the National Anthem. Back in those days, the national anthem was sung pretty straight forward. They kept to the tradition and did not really branch out too much whether it be harmonically or form wise. However, that all changed when Jose Feliciano became one of the first artist to put his own twist on it.

Image result for jose feliciano 1968
https://www.news-press.com/story/entertainment/2018/10/05/jose-feliciano-paid-price-when-he-sang-national-anthem-1968/1514370002/

Feliciano sang it in a Latin, jazz twist. He reharmonized the song making it sound very different compared to the traditional sound. It still hints the main key centers such as the secondary dominance going to the V chord, but overall the song really speaks to who he is as an artist. He had this laidback, acoustic sound to him which was what got him his first success of singing The Doors’s “Light My Fire”. Feliciano turned this national anthem into a song that represented himself. As great as it sounds in today’s ear, in 1968, the audience had a much different view.

The audience responded with boo’s and cheers. Some said “It was a disgrace, an insult. I’m going to write my senator about it”, or “It sounded like a hippie was singing it”. In a way, these quotes make sense. 1968 was a tense time since the Vietnam war was going on and protests against the war were still going on. People who saw Feliciano for the first time saw this guy with long hair, sunglasses and a dog beside him. At first glance, it does imply that this artist is with the protesters, but the the sunglasses and dog are actually because he is blind. Once his performance was over, many of the listeners truly believed it became a political stunt rather than an artist singing an original version.

If that were true, that would be a huge statement on society. This was an immigrant singing his interpretation of the American National at a major sporting event. His look and musical voice represented a one side of the political sides at the time. People thought it was unpatriotic. However, that was not Feliciano’s view on it. Feliciano was shocked and taken back on the criticized he received. He hoped to convey the complete opposite. On Flag day at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, Feliciano talks about what he hoped to convey to the immigrants in American or new citizens. He says “what it’s like for me to be an American, and they’re in for a treat. If they work hard, they’ll have no regrets. I have no regrets, though I was the first artist to stylize the national anthem, and I got a lot of protests for it. I have no regrets. America has been good to me. I’m glad that I’m here.”

Though many people condemned this performance, there were some supporters in his rendition. Tim McCarver, catcher for the Cardinals, said “Why not that way? People go through a routine when they play the anthem. They stand up and yawn and almost fall asleep. This way, at least they listened.” Bill Freehan of the Tigers said “I know one thing. He made Marvin Gaye, who sang the anthem Sunday, sound like a square.” This rendition became an inspiration for other versions. Many artists today, put their own spin on the anthem.

This relates to The New Yorker article “Colin Kaepernick and the Radical uses of ‘Star-Spangled Banner’”. Here is an influential figure in both sports and society actively voicing his opinion. Colin Kaepernick refused to stand while the “Star-Spangled Banner” was played before a preseason game. He states “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color”.

Image result for colin kaepernick knee
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/colin-kaepernick-football-protests.html

These two topics both have the deal in politics however, Kaepernick intentionally created a stance while Feliciano did not. It shows how powerful and influential this figures have on American society and culture. The fact that both these topics influenced many and became a national topic just shows the impact they have. In the end, they both stuck to who they are as people and believed that their actions would represent themselves.

Sources

  • https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/sports/baseball/national-anthem.html
  • https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2017/11/02/560948130/a-different-national-anthem-before-the-nation-was-ready-for-it
  • https://www.mlb.com/cut4/jose-feliciano-national-anthem-was-50-years-ago-c296904880
  • https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/for-50-years-jose-felicianos-soulful-take-national-anthem-given-pride-immigrant-pride-180969380/
  • http://josefeliciano.com/wp/biography/
  • https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/colin-kaepernick-and-the-radical-uses-of-the-star-spangled-banner
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1ZQawbo4Mo
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_lCmBvYMRs
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTuoq6TllaU
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMA2iF6RuXk
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RtTWDv-yWM

Sibelius Finlandia: Representing a Nation Through Sound

Representing a nation with sound has been an important part of history. Most nations of the world have a national anthem they use that shows praise, devotion and patriotism for their country. The national anthem, like other national symbols of a country, represents the history, struggles, traditions and beliefs of a nation and its people. It serves as an expression of national identity and is seen by many to be a unifying factor for its people. During a performance of a national anthem, a lot of citizens of a nation rise up in unison to respect and listen to/sing their country’s song. Now that you have an introduction to the purpose of a national anthem and the impact it has, I want to compare it to Sibelius’ Finlandia and the way it influenced the country of Finland and its people.

In a way, Finlandia became the country’s national anthem for those seeking independence for Finland. Sibelius is arguably the most important composer associated with nationalism. He had written Finlandia as part of his Press Celebration Music suite for an event-a political rally of sorts to protest Russia’s increasing censorship and other cruel measures against Finland. To avoid censorship, this piece was actually not performed under the title Finlandia. With the increasing censorship, a wave of protest was sparked, and an outpouring of music was sparked in Sibelius. With this composition, Sibelius basically secured his reputation as Finland’s national musical voice. The piece starts with a sense of struggle, said to be representative of the ominous Russian Empire, but ends with its famous hymn like melody that made this peace iconic for Finish nationalism. The melody from Finlandia is instantly memorable and timeless. The hymns words have become an unofficial national anthem of Finland.

I found a cool YouTube video that shows the history of Finland and Finlandia while playing the piece. It has nice pictures of the country and it also includes the words of the hymn in the piece. You can find it here. There is also a live recording linked here done by the BBC Chorus and Symphony. It’s a pretty cool piece. And while I’m at it, I’ll link you to a flashmob of Finlandia. It’s amazing how such a beautiful melody can express such powerful nationalism.

A national anthem is mostly used during a national important day and military honors, but it has also become a thing to play the national anthem for sporting events. William Robin’s article “Colin Kaepernick and the Radical Uses of the Star Spangled Banner” is a great example of how a country can be represented through sound. Regardless of what you believe about America’s National Anthem and it’s writer, this is proof that music can be a huge part of representing a nation and the meaning behind it can be very deep and transcendent to people, and it can also represent different meanings for everyone. Regardless of what you believe, it’s amazing how music can be used to represent a nation.

I liked the quote in the article that says “understanding the song as it has been sung moves us beyond the politics of one man and toward comprehending how the anthem has functioned as a powerful articulation of citizenship.” As you can see, a piece such as Finlandia, or a country’s national anthem can represent a lot more than just a song. It shows the pride of a nation through sound and can unify people and share a country’s rich history and beauty. Sibelius’s piece is noted for sparking an outpour of Finish national pride and rallied the Finnish people together which ultimately lead to their freedom.