{"id":1117,"date":"2019-01-31T13:28:44","date_gmt":"2019-01-31T13:28:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gcornish.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/mhs123_spring2019\/?p=1117"},"modified":"2019-02-04T07:47:51","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T07:47:51","slug":"spatialization-in-the-renaissance-polyphony-a-short-history-of-its-aesthetics-and-application","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gcornish.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/mhs123_spring2019\/assignments\/everyday-technologies\/spatialization-in-the-renaissance-polyphony-a-short-history-of-its-aesthetics-and-application\/","title":{"rendered":"Spatialization in the Renaissance Polyphony: A Short History of its Aesthetics and Application"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Music, besides a purely sensual, and often surreal, kind of enjoyment, has a million facets and presents a wide array of different challenges for different mentalities: for performers, music is a fluid oscillation between obtaining eloquent delivery of tones and phrases, and reimagining the philosophical pillars with which the piece in question was derived; for composers, and usually scholars as well, music yields a metaphysical reality, by pursuing which our concerns about material, and sometimes even practical, realities shrivel; for the general audience (assuming one that is familiar with the context of the piece they listen or recollect), music tends to be interpreted as a manifestation of an all-encompassing, higher being, in which the listener is dissolved, elevated to a vantage point, and able to re-deliver the comprehensivity of the music.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discussions of the psychological impact of music are often imbued with that praising its extraordinary illusionary capabilities. This observation, however, pertains directly to an integral part in musical imagination: space. Composers use techniques of distance and spatiality to create a premise for intricate structural progressions and volatile ideas; sometimes it becomes so compelling that the listener\u2019s awareness of the surrounding is completely subsumed into it. In such cases an \u2018environment\u2019 is created. In relation to more traditional aesthetics, the sole agenda of creating space is to create an alternative path towards metaphysical reality, apart from teachings of reasoning. Space instills fertility of thought in us. When we listen to music attentively enough, the boundary between the listener, who perceives sonic information, and the music, which configures and \u2018emanates\u2019 the information, is obscured; therefore it is not hard to imagine the multiplicity and simultaneity of perceptual conduits and the listener\u2019s self-awareness achieved by spatialization, through which the attentive locating of sound \u2014 sometimes the listener\u2019s subconscious, self-seeking appreciation of such attentiveness as well \u2014 is transposed to a kind of panoramic \u2018vision\u2019 when the listener recognizes another sound source. The experience is then translated into, to a certain extent, an experience of anonymity and metaphysical clarity beyond the subjectively imposed characterization of external sonic objects. Ultimately, a virtual environment is created, and the listener is rendered receptive of it; the processes of signification is diluted within a complex procedure of transitioning between being and non-being. The listener\u2019s ideas are therefore, ideally, equally represented and given \u2018amorphous\u2019 shapes according to how the composite matters are delimited and when the ideas \u2018intersect\u2019 the music during the listening experience. When we internalize spatiality, polyphony begins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The spatialization technology has nowadays been primarily associated with electronic settings thanks to the proliferation of electronic music and development of electronic equipments. Its root, however, can be traced far back to the antiphonal singing of chants in the medieval era. The antiphonal style, that is, the call-and-response setting between segregated choruses, has been implemented in chants more than the responsorial (solo-chorus) style and the direct (unison choir) style. Besides exploring the poetic images behind the antiphons<\/a>, the Renaissance era inherited the performance practices and further intensified implicit soundscapes in significantly elaborate polyphony. One can relate this movement to concurrent scientific discoveries (or, perhaps more accurately, the acknowledgment of their validity from the Church) regarding the motional and spatial relativity between Earth and other celestial objects, which helped replacing the Earth-centric view of the universe with a spatially much greater one. The explosive expansion of the hypothetical universe led to a new way of looking at space; the spherical representation of the universe and the sphere as a theological representation of perfection both emerged during this period, and the octave, considered the most \u2018spherical\u2019 of all intervals, was employed in ways of enhancing, regulating and reorganizing the tonal space \u2014 the handling of tonal implications and motional relativity had been increasingly reified and conceptualized such that it virtually became a \u2018spatial\u2019 parameter \u2014 which correlates to a revised end-goal of contrapuntal writing. Counterpoint had been treated as, obviously enough, a rigorously linear, \u2018contrapuntal\u2019 context in the previous century. This can be seen in Johannes Tinctoris\u2019 formulation in his 1477 thesis Liber de arte contrapuncti<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Counterpoint is a regulated and rational concentus [literally, \u201csinging together\u201d] realized by setting one voice against another. Its name counterpoint derives from counter and point, because one note is set against another as if it were constituted by one point against another.<\/p>Tinctoris , Liber de arte contrapuncti<\/em>, 1477<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, new ideas emerged unhindered, and we see the recognition of the totality of polyphony as a \u2018body,\u2019 an organic whole. Counterpoint had since therefore been endowed a mystical quality. Here is one example of numerous expressions of the then-revolutionary theory, quoted from Franchinus Gaffurius\u2019 Angelicum ac divinum opus musice<\/em>, written in 1518:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The concento or many-voiced work is a certain organism that contains different parts adapted for singing and disposed between voices distanced in commensurable intervals. This is what the singers call counterpoint.<\/p>Gaffurius, Angelicum ac divinum opus musice<\/em>, 1518<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The latter one, notably favored by theorist Gioseffo\u00a0Zarlino who appropriated the quote nearly verbatim in his seminal treatise Istitutioni harmoniche<\/em>, combined the perception of external spatiality and that of the internal analogue into a single, transcendent unit. If external spatial distribution was to be viewed as insufficient to fulfill our perceptual intuitions, Gaffurius\u2019 conception of the organic composition may well serve to alleviate the apparent mediocrity of the seemingly signal-like, \u2018unmusical\u2019 tactics. In other words, spatialization had again been able to yield its perceptual potency thanks to the intensification of tonal organization. Further discussion of its aesthetic history can be found in this beautifully written paper<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The revitalized interest in spatial arrangement was evident in the architectural plans of Catholic churches. Many of the them have places specially designed for antiphonal choirs; in this article<\/a>, the author specifically examines the floor plan of St Mark\u2019s Basilica in Venice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The symmetrical layout is typical for Catholic architectures; note the cruciform design. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The liturgical significance of antiphonal settings is evident here; while the organ is introduced into architectures, spaces are retained for antiphonal choirs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unsurprisingly, antiphonal writing is enormously difficult because, by the time polyphony came into fruition during the mid- and late-Renaissance era, segregated choirs were treated not only as purely antiphonal but also as a composite choir. Besides maintaining independence of melodic lines, the composer has to manage the composite choir \u2014 typically an eight-part force divided into two four-part choirs with equal forces \u2014 in a way that the independence of individual choirs can be recognized while the unity of the eight-part body is preserved. In Istitutioni harmoniche<\/em> Zarlino wrote about the principles of writing of this kind:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because the choirs are located at some distance from one another, the composer must see to it that each chorus has music that is consonant, that is without dissonance among its parts, and that each has a self-sufficient four-part harmony. Yet when the choirs sound together, their parts must make good harmony without dissonances. Thus composed, each choir has independent music which could be sung separately without offending the ear.<\/p>Zarlino, Istitutioni harmoniche<\/em>, 1558<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n